Our Lawyers
Pacemaker Implant Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago
A pacemaker implant is a serious cardiac procedure, and when it goes wrong due to a doctor’s negligence, the consequences can be life-altering or fatal. Patients in Chicago who have suffered harm from a pacemaker implant error deserve to understand their legal rights, what qualifies as malpractice, and how Illinois law protects them. If you or a family member has been hurt by a careless medical provider, a Chicago personal injury lawyer at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can help you pursue justice.
Table of Contents
- What a Pacemaker Implant Error Actually Means in a Medical Malpractice Case
- Common Types of Pacemaker Implant Errors That Lead to Malpractice Claims
- Illinois Law Requirements for Filing a Pacemaker Malpractice Claim
- What Damages Can You Recover From a Pacemaker Implant Error in Chicago?
- How Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles Pacemaker Malpractice Cases in Chicago
- FAQs About Pacemaker Implant Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago
What a Pacemaker Implant Error Actually Means in a Medical Malpractice Case
A pacemaker is a small electronic device placed in the chest to regulate the heart’s electrical activity. The device is typically placed just below the collarbone, and leads are run through large veins in the chest directly into the heart. Doctors recommend pacemakers for patients with arrhythmia, heart block, and other conditions where the heart beats too slowly or irregularly.
Not every bad outcome after a pacemaker procedure is malpractice. With any procedure involving the heart, there is a risk of injury or death, and most complications will not lead to a viable medical malpractice claim. The key question is whether the doctor’s actions fell below the accepted standard of care.
The standard of care is the level of care that a reasonably competent medical professional, with similar education and in the same or similar circumstances in the same medical community, would provide given the same set of treatment circumstances. When a cardiologist or cardiac surgeon deviates from that standard and a patient suffers harm, a malpractice claim may exist.
Doctors who perform pacemaker implantation surgeries must monitor and react to the patient’s condition during the procedure. If an adverse symptom arises, the standard of care requires that the doctor recognize the condition and modify or cease the treatment appropriately. Failure to do so may be grounds for a medical malpractice lawsuit.
Chicago-area patients treated at hospitals near Millennium Park, along the Magnificent Mile, or in the Medical District near Rush University Medical Center all have access to some of the country’s top cardiac facilities. Even so, errors happen, and knowing what counts as a legal violation matters.
Common Types of Pacemaker Implant Errors That Lead to Malpractice Claims
Several specific errors during or after a pacemaker implant can form the basis of a malpractice claim. Understanding these categories helps patients recognize when something may have gone wrong.
Lead displacement or perforation. Complications associated with leads include infection, thrombosis, cardiac perforation, dislodgement, and lead fracture. Lead fracture is estimated at 2% per patient-year, and lead displacement occurs in 2% to 5% of endocardial leads. When these outcomes result from improper technique rather than inherent risk, negligence may be at issue.
Pneumothorax from improper access. Permanent pacemakers are usually implanted via the cephalic, axillary, or subclavian veins. Dissection of the cephalic vein avoids the risk of pneumothorax that can occur with the subclavian puncture technique, but considerable surgical skill is required. A surgeon who chooses a riskier access route without the skill to execute it safely may be liable for a resulting pneumothorax.
Cardiac perforation. Lead displacement and perforation with system dysfunction is a relatively common complication. Perforation of the pericardium can lead to pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade. When a surgeon fails to monitor for these complications after the procedure, the delay in treatment can cause serious harm.
Implanting a known defective device. Pacemaker implantation complications may also stem from defective devices. Because there have been many defective pacemaker lawsuits, doctors have access to lists of brands and batches of pacemakers found to be defective. They are required to confirm the device’s serial number, its fitness for use, and are forbidden to implant any device deemed defective.
Failure to recognize post-operative warning signs. Delayed intervention can allow device failures to go unnoticed until catastrophic injury occurs. Symptoms such as fainting, chest pain, dizziness, shortness of breath, or repeated shocks should trigger immediate evaluation. Dismissing these warning signs may constitute a dangerous breach of the standard of care.
Patients recovering near their homes in Wicker Park, Lincoln Park, or the South Loop deserve attentive post-operative follow-up. When that follow-up fails, the results can be devastating.
Illinois Law Requirements for Filing a Pacemaker Malpractice Claim
Illinois has specific legal requirements that apply to every medical malpractice claim, including those involving pacemaker errors. Meeting these requirements is not optional. Missing any one of them can end a valid case before it begins.
Certificate of merit under 735 ILCS 5/2-622. Under the Illinois Healing Art Malpractice statute, 735 ILCS 5/2-622, every medical malpractice complaint must be filed with an affidavit from the plaintiff’s attorney. That affidavit must state that a qualified health professional reviewed the case, determined the medical records support the claim, and concluded there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for filing. The reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the same area of medicine within the past six years and must be qualified by experience or demonstrated competence. This requirement exists to screen out frivolous claims before they reach a courtroom.
Statute of limitations under 735 ILCS 5/13-212. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought. In most cases, the deadline is two years from when the patient knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and its connection to medical care, but there is usually a four-year outside limit from the act or omission.
The four-year outer limit is called the statute of repose. Illinois imposes an absolute deadline: no medical malpractice action can be brought more than four years after the date on which the alleged act or omission occurred. After four years from the date of the malpractice, claims are barred regardless of when the injury was discovered.
No cap on compensatory damages. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice cases in Illinois. However, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that caps on non-economic compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases are unconstitutional. This means there is no legal ceiling on the amount of economic or non-economic damages a plaintiff can recover in a pacemaker malpractice case.
Wrongful death claims. If a pacemaker implant error caused a patient’s death, family members may bring a claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180/1. This statute allows surviving family members to recover damages when a person’s death was caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default. Note that punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice wrongful death claims under this statute.
Working with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer from the start helps ensure these requirements are met correctly and on time.
What Damages Can You Recover From a Pacemaker Implant Error in Chicago?
Victims of pacemaker malpractice in Illinois can pursue both economic and non-economic damages. The goal is to make the injured person as whole as possible after a preventable medical error.
Economic damages cover the financial losses caused by the malpractice. These include the cost of corrective surgeries to reposition or replace a malfunctioning pacemaker, additional hospital stays, follow-up care, rehabilitation, and any future medical expenses related to the harm. If a pacemaker implant procedure is botched due to medical negligence, a patient may have to undergo additional intrusive procedures or even multiple surgeries to fix the problem. Additional tests, doctors’ appointments, and surgeries all mean additional expenses. Often, doctors and hospitals will deny negligence and leave the patient to foot those additional expenses. Lost wages and lost earning capacity also fall under economic damages.
Non-economic damages compensate for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and the physical limitations that a pacemaker error can impose. When the pacemaker is not properly implanted, a patient may suffer from fainting spells, lightheadedness, and debilitating heart palpitations. These symptoms can affect every part of daily life, from keeping a job to enjoying time with family near Navy Pier or Millennium Park.
Attorney fees in medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114. Under this statute, the total contingent fee for a plaintiff’s attorney in a medical malpractice action shall not exceed 33 1/3% of all sums recovered. This cap protects clients while still allowing injured patients to access quality legal representation on a contingency basis, meaning you pay no attorney fee unless you recover compensation.
A medical malpractice attorney at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can assess the full scope of your damages and build a claim designed to recover everything you are entitled to under Illinois law.
How Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles Pacemaker Malpractice Cases in Chicago
Pacemaker malpractice cases are medically and legally demanding. They require a thorough review of surgical records, device interrogation data, post-operative notes, and imaging studies. They also require a qualified cardiac expert who can explain exactly how the standard of care was breached and how that breach caused the patient’s harm.
At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, our team takes these cases seriously from the first call. We review the medical records, identify the relevant providers, and work with credentialed medical professionals to evaluate whether the care fell below accepted standards. We handle the 735 ILCS 5/2-622 certificate of merit process, the filing deadlines, and the litigation strategy so you can focus on your health and your family.
We represent clients throughout the Chicago area, including those who received care at hospitals and cardiac centers in the Loop, Near North Side, Hyde Park, and surrounding communities. Whether your case involves a lead displacement that went undetected, a post-operative infection that was ignored, or a failure to monitor for device failure, we are prepared to investigate and pursue your claim.
Our firm handles medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, our fee is a percentage of what we recover for you, capped at 33 1/3%. You owe nothing unless we win.
If you believe a pacemaker implant error harmed you or someone you love, do not wait. The deadlines under 735 ILCS 5/13-212 are strict, and evidence becomes harder to preserve over time. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg today at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. Our office is located at 205 W. Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606. You can also reach our team through our network of Illinois offices, where a medical malpractice lawyer is ready to discuss your situation.
Clients across the region also work with our team in Joliet, where a medical malpractice attorney handles cases with the same commitment to accountability. And in the northern suburbs, our medical malpractice lawyer in Gurnee serves families who deserve answers after a preventable cardiac care failure.
FAQs About Pacemaker Implant Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago
How do I know if my pacemaker complication was malpractice or just a known risk of the procedure?
Not every complication after a pacemaker implant is malpractice. Some complications, like minor bruising or short-term soreness, are recognized risks that patients accept when they consent to the procedure. Malpractice occurs when a doctor’s actions fell below the accepted standard of care and that failure caused your harm. For example, if a surgeon used an improper technique that caused a lead perforation, or if post-operative warning signs like chest pain and dizziness were dismissed without evaluation, those failures may support a malpractice claim. A qualified medical professional must review your records to make that determination, which is also a legal requirement under 735 ILCS 5/2-622 before any Illinois malpractice case can be filed.
How long do I have to file a pacemaker malpractice lawsuit in Illinois?
Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), you generally have two years from the date you knew or reasonably should have known that your injury was connected to medical negligence. However, no claim can be filed more than four years after the date of the negligent act or omission, regardless of when you discovered the problem. This four-year period is called the statute of repose, and it is a hard deadline with very limited exceptions. Because pacemaker complications sometimes appear weeks or months after the procedure, the clock can start ticking before you realize something went wrong. Contact an attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights.
Can I sue the hospital as well as the surgeon for a pacemaker implant error?
Yes, in many cases both the surgeon and the hospital can be held liable. Hospitals can face liability for their own negligence, including failures in post-operative monitoring, inadequate staffing, or using equipment that was known to be defective. If the nursing staff failed to respond to warning signs of a device complication, that failure may also support a claim against the hospital. Identifying all responsible parties is an important part of building a complete case, and an attorney can help you evaluate who bears legal responsibility for your harm.
What if the pacemaker itself was defective, not the surgeon’s technique?
If the device was defective from the manufacturer, you may have a product liability claim against the manufacturer in addition to, or instead of, a malpractice claim against the doctor. However, if the doctor knew or had reason to know that a particular brand or batch of pacemakers had a history of problems, the doctor can also be held liable for choosing to implant that device. Doctors are required to confirm the serial number and fitness of any pacemaker before implanting it. A thorough investigation of the device records, recall history, and the surgeon’s decision-making process is necessary to determine the right legal theory for your case.
What does it cost to hire Briskman Briskman & Greenberg for a pacemaker malpractice case?
Briskman Briskman & Greenberg handles medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fee unless the firm recovers compensation for you. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, the total contingent fee in Illinois medical malpractice cases is capped at 33 1/3% of all sums recovered. You should be aware that while there is no upfront attorney fee, clients may still be responsible for certain case costs and expenses. Your attorney will explain the full fee arrangement clearly before you sign anything. To discuss your case at no cost, call (312) 222-0010 or visit the firm’s office at 205 W. Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606.
More Resources About Medical Device and Implant Negligence in Chicago
SEEN ON:
