Our Lawyers
Orthopedic Implant Negligence Medical Malpractice in Chicago
Orthopedic implants, including hip replacements, knee replacements, spinal hardware, and shoulder implants, are meant to restore your mobility and reduce pain. When a surgeon places one of those devices incorrectly, uses the wrong size, fails to monitor for complications, or ignores signs of implant failure, the result can be catastrophic. Patients across Chicago, from the Near North Side to Beverly to Hyde Park, trust their orthopedic surgeons with some of the most physically demanding procedures in medicine. That trust deserves to be honored. When it is not, Illinois law gives injured patients the right to hold negligent providers accountable.
Table of Contents
- What Orthopedic Implant Negligence Looks Like in a Medical Malpractice Case
- How Illinois Law Defines Your Right to File an Orthopedic Implant Malpractice Claim
- The Statute of Limitations for Orthopedic Implant Malpractice Claims in Illinois
- What Damages Can You Recover in an Orthopedic Implant Negligence Case
- How Implant Recalls and Defective Devices Affect Your Chicago Malpractice Claim
- Why Chicago Patients Choose Briskman Briskman & Greenberg for Implant Malpractice Cases
- FAQs About Orthopedic Implant Negligence Medical Malpractice in Chicago
What Orthopedic Implant Negligence Looks Like in a Medical Malpractice Case
Orthopedic implant negligence happens when a healthcare provider fails to meet the accepted standard of care during the selection, placement, or follow-up monitoring of a surgical implant. This is not simply a case of a bad outcome. Every surgery carries risk, and not every complication is malpractice. The question is whether a reasonably competent orthopedic surgeon, given the same circumstances, would have acted differently.
Common examples of implant negligence include placing a hip or knee prosthesis at the wrong angle, using a component that is too large or too small for the patient’s anatomy, failing to check for implant loosening during post-operative visits, and ignoring patient complaints of pain or instability that signal a failing device. Surgeons who perform joint replacement procedures at facilities near the Illinois Medical District on the Near West Side, or at major academic hospitals along the lakefront, are held to the same professional standard as any orthopedic provider in the state.
Negligence can also occur when a surgeon continues using a device that has been flagged for problems. Orthopedic devices account for approximately 12% of all medical device recalls in the United States. Design-related failures are the most prevalent cause of recalls, often involving modular junctions or material degradation. A surgeon who implants a device knowing it has design problems, or who fails to notify a patient after a recall, may be liable for the harm that follows.
Spinal hardware errors present their own category of implant negligence. Pedicle screws placed in the wrong position can compress nerve roots, cause permanent weakness, or require dangerous revision surgery. Patients who suffered these injuries after procedures at Chicago-area hospitals have the right to explore whether their surgeon’s conduct fell below the standard of care. If you believe your implant was placed incorrectly or that complications were ignored, speaking with a Chicago personal injury lawyer who handles medical malpractice claims is a practical first step.
How Illinois Law Defines Your Right to File an Orthopedic Implant Malpractice Claim
Illinois medical malpractice law requires you to prove four things: the provider owed you a duty of care, the provider breached that duty, the breach caused your injury, and you suffered real damages as a result. These elements apply directly to orthopedic implant cases, whether the claim involves a misplaced knee replacement, a failed spinal fusion, or a hip implant that caused bone erosion due to metal toxicity.
Before you can even file suit in Illinois, you must satisfy the requirements of 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the Healing Art Malpractice statute. This law requires you to attach an affidavit to your complaint stating that a qualified health professional reviewed your case and concluded there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. That reviewing professional must practice or have practiced within the last six years in the same area of medicine at issue, which in an orthopedic implant case typically means a board-certified orthopedic surgeon. Missing this requirement can result in dismissal of your case.
Illinois also follows a modified comparative fault rule. If you are found to share some responsibility for your injury, your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. However, if your fault exceeds 50%, you cannot recover at all. This matters in implant cases where a defense might argue that you failed to follow post-operative instructions or delayed reporting symptoms. Working with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer helps you anticipate and counter those arguments with solid medical evidence.
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for a plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses. This means that if multiple parties, such as the surgeon, the hospital, and the device manufacturer, all bear some responsibility, each one who holds 25% or more of the total fault is jointly and severally liable for all other damages beyond medical expenses. This is important in complex implant cases where fault may be shared across several parties.
The Statute of Limitations for Orthopedic Implant Malpractice Claims in Illinois
Time limits in Illinois medical malpractice cases are strict, and orthopedic implant claims are no exception. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought. In orthopedic implant cases, that clock does not always start on the day of surgery. Many patients do not realize their implant has failed, migrated, or caused internal damage until months or years after the procedure.
The Illinois Supreme Court in Moon v. Rhode (2016 IL 119572) confirmed that discovery requires dual knowledge. Awareness of an adverse medical outcome alone is insufficient; the limitations period begins only when the plaintiff has reason to connect the injury to negligent medical care. So if you had a hip replacement at a hospital near the I-290 corridor and you only recently learned through a second opinion that the implant was placed incorrectly, your two-year window may have started at the point of that discovery, not at the time of surgery.
There is, however, an absolute outer limit. Illinois also imposes a four-year statute of repose measured from the date of the negligent act or omission. No matter when you discover the harm, you generally cannot file a claim more than four years after the date of the surgical error itself. This makes early legal consultation critical. Waiting to see if the pain improves, or assuming the problem will resolve on its own, can permanently eliminate your right to compensation.
If fraudulent concealment is involved, meaning a provider deliberately hid the error from you, under 735 ILCS 5/13-215, if a healthcare provider intentionally hides wrongdoing, victims have five years from the time they discover the fraudulent concealment to file a lawsuit. These situations are fact-specific and require careful legal analysis. An medical malpractice attorney can review your timeline and determine which deadline applies to your situation.
What Damages Can You Recover in an Orthopedic Implant Negligence Case
Successful orthopedic implant malpractice claims can result in significant compensation. Illinois does not cap economic or non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. The Illinois Supreme Court struck down the state’s prior damage cap in Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital in 2010, and no replacement cap has been enacted. This means your recovery is limited only by the evidence you present, not by an arbitrary ceiling.
Economic damages cover the measurable financial losses caused by the negligence. These include the cost of revision surgery, which is often more complex and expensive than the original procedure, ongoing physical therapy, lost wages if the injury kept you from working, and any future medical care you will need as a result of the failed implant. Patients who needed a second hip replacement after a poorly placed primary implant, for example, can pursue compensation for both surgeries and all related care.
Non-economic damages compensate for the human cost of the injury. Chronic pain, loss of mobility, inability to enjoy activities you loved before the surgery, and emotional distress are all recoverable. A patient who can no longer walk through Millennium Park, tend a garden in Lincoln Square, or play with grandchildren because of a negligently placed knee implant has suffered real losses that go beyond medical bills.
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, the Contingent Fees for Attorneys in Medical Malpractice Actions statute, attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are capped at 33 1/3% of all sums recovered. This fee structure means your attorney’s interest is aligned with maximizing your recovery, and you pay nothing unless your case succeeds. If you are ready to explore your options, contact a medical malpractice lawyer to discuss what your claim may be worth.
How Implant Recalls and Defective Devices Affect Your Chicago Malpractice Claim
An implant recall does not automatically mean your surgeon committed malpractice, but it can be powerful evidence in your case. Physicians and hospitals are responsible for communicating recall information to patients. A surgeon or hospital that fails to notify you after a recall, or that continues using a recalled device, may face liability for any harm that follows.
In total, 19.4% of hip and 20.3% of knee arthroplasty devices were recalled in one major review. The hazard of recall by 10 years for hip and knee arthroplasty devices was approximately 24%. These numbers reflect the reality that implant failure is not a rare event. When a device fails because of a design defect, the manufacturer may also bear responsibility under product liability law, separate from any malpractice claim against the surgeon.
In Illinois, product liability claims based on strict tort liability are also subject to the joint and several liability rules under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117. This means that in a case involving a defective hip implant, both the manufacturer and the negligent surgeon could be held responsible for your medical expenses. Your attorney can identify all potentially liable parties and pursue each one appropriately.
The distinction between a device defect and surgical negligence matters in practice. If the implant itself was flawed, your claim runs against the manufacturer. If the surgeon chose the wrong device for your anatomy, placed it incorrectly, or failed to follow up after warning signs appeared, your claim runs against the medical provider. Many cases involve both. Working with an medical malpractice attorney who understands how to coordinate these theories of liability gives you the strongest possible position going into litigation or settlement negotiations.
Why Chicago Patients Choose Briskman Briskman & Greenberg for Implant Malpractice Cases
Orthopedic implant malpractice cases are among the most technically demanding claims in personal injury law. They require medical records analysis, consultation with qualified orthopedic experts, a clear understanding of device recall history, and the ability to present complex surgical concepts to a judge or jury at the Daley Center in downtown Chicago. These cases demand preparation and commitment.
Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a Chicago personal injury law firm that handles medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Our firm takes the time to understand exactly what went wrong with your implant, who was responsible, and what your injuries have cost you, both financially and personally.
We serve clients throughout the Chicago area, including patients who received care at hospitals and surgical centers in the Loop, Wicker Park, Bridgeport, and surrounding communities. Our office is located at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606, and we are ready to review your case. Call us at (312) 222-0010 to schedule a free consultation. There is no obligation, and speaking with us does not create an attorney-client relationship until you and the firm agree to move forward together.
If you believe your orthopedic implant was placed negligently, or that a surgeon or hospital failed to respond properly to signs of implant failure, do not wait. The deadlines under Illinois law are firm, and evidence is easier to preserve when you act early. Reach out to Briskman Briskman & Greenberg today.
FAQs About Orthopedic Implant Negligence Medical Malpractice in Chicago
Can I sue my surgeon if my hip or knee implant fails?
You may have a valid claim if your surgeon’s conduct fell below the accepted standard of care. Implant failure alone is not proof of malpractice. However, if the device was placed at the wrong angle, the wrong size was selected, or your surgeon ignored warning signs of failure, those facts can support a negligence claim. Illinois requires you to file an affidavit under 735 ILCS 5/2-622 confirming that a qualified orthopedic professional reviewed your case and found a reasonable basis for the claim before your lawsuit can proceed.
How long do I have to file an orthopedic implant malpractice claim in Illinois?
Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), you generally have two years from the date you knew or reasonably should have known that your injury was caused by medical negligence. An absolute four-year statute of repose runs from the date of the surgical error itself. Because implant problems are sometimes discovered long after surgery, the exact start date of your deadline depends on the specific facts of your case. Consulting an attorney as soon as possible protects your rights.
What if the implant was recalled after my surgery?
A recall can strengthen your case significantly. Physicians and hospitals have a duty to inform patients when a device they received has been recalled. If your surgeon or hospital failed to notify you of a recall, or continued using a recalled device, they may bear additional liability. You may also have a separate product liability claim against the device manufacturer, depending on whether the recall was related to a design or manufacturing defect. These claims can run alongside your malpractice case.
Who can be held liable in an orthopedic implant malpractice case?
Liability can extend to the operating surgeon, the hospital or surgical center, the anesthesiologist, and in some cases the device manufacturer. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, defendants who are found to bear 25% or more of the total fault are jointly and severally liable for all damages beyond past and future medical expenses. This means a single defendant may be responsible for the full award even if multiple parties share fault, depending on how the court allocates percentages.
What if I signed a consent form before the surgery?
Signing a surgical consent form does not waive your right to bring a malpractice claim. Consent forms acknowledge known risks of a procedure, but they do not authorize negligence. If your surgeon deviated from the standard of care, used the wrong implant, placed it incorrectly, or failed to monitor for complications, the consent form does not protect them from liability. An attorney can review the specific language in your consent documents and explain how it affects your case.
More Resources About Medical Device and Implant Negligence in Chicago
SEEN ON:
