Get a Free Consultation with a Personal Injury Lawyer

Review by T.V.

"I highly recommend BB&G ... I would give 10 stars if I could!"

T

Review by G.V.

"I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!"

G

Review by M.S.

"The attorneys at BBG were exceptional. The outcome was better than we hoped."

M

Review by R.G.

"From the moment I contacted this firm I was treated like family."

R

Review by A.H.

"We couldn't be happier with the outcome or the excellent service."

A

Review by V.A.

"We felt very secure and confident with their representation."

V

Review by J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a legal force to be reckoned with."

J

Review by T.Z.

"I'm happy with how they handled my case and recommend giving them a call!"

T

Review by K.N.

"Very easy process with the help of these amazing people. Very happy outcome!"

K

Missed Cancer on Biopsy Medical Malpractice in Chicago

A biopsy is supposed to give you a definitive answer. When a pathologist or physician misses cancer on a biopsy sample, that answer is wrong, and the consequences can be devastating. Cancer that could have been caught at Stage I or Stage II may progress to an advanced stage before anyone realizes the mistake. If you or someone you love received a false-negative biopsy result in Chicago, Illinois, you may have grounds for a medical malpractice claim against the responsible provider. The personal injury attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg represent patients harmed by diagnostic failures throughout the Chicago area.

Table of Contents

What It Means When Cancer Is Missed on a Biopsy

Missing cancer on a biopsy means a tissue sample contained cancerous cells, but the result was reported as negative or benign. The patient walks away believing they are cancer-free. Treatment is delayed. The cancer grows. By the time someone catches the error, the disease may be far more advanced and far harder to treat.

This type of error falls into a broader category of diagnostic failures. It is distinct from a delayed cancer diagnosis, where cancer is eventually detected through the same process but reported late. A missed biopsy result means the sample itself was either collected, processed, or analyzed incorrectly, producing a false-negative finding.

There are two primary ways this happens. The first is a sampling error, where the needle or instrument does not capture the malignant portion of the tissue. A biopsy may miss cancer when the needle or forceps simply does not capture the malignant portion of a lesion, which is more likely when lesions are small, irregular, difficult to visualize, or located in hard-to-reach areas. The second is a pathology interpretation error, where the sample does contain cancerous cells but the pathologist fails to identify them correctly.

Errors in cancer diagnosis are reported to occur in up to 11.8% of all reviewed cytologic-histologic specimen pairs, according to a study published in PubMed that measured the institutional frequency, cause, and clinical impact of diagnostic cancer errors. The cause of errors resulting from pathologic misinterpretation ranged from 5.0% to 50.7%, and the aggregated data demonstrated that for gynecologic and nongynecologic errors, 45% and 39%, respectively, were associated with patient harm.

These numbers represent real people, many of them right here in Chicago’s neighborhoods, from Wicker Park to Hyde Park to Beverly. When a missed biopsy result leads to advanced cancer, the legal question becomes whether the error fell below the accepted standard of medical care.

How Illinois Law Defines Medical Malpractice in Biopsy Cases

Under Illinois law, a missed cancer on biopsy can form the basis of a medical malpractice claim when a healthcare provider’s conduct fell below the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent professional in the same field. This standard applies to the physician who ordered the biopsy, the professional who performed the procedure, and the pathologist who analyzed the tissue sample.

To bring a viable claim in Illinois, a patient must establish four elements. First, the provider owed the patient a duty of care. Second, the provider breached that duty. Third, the breach caused the patient’s harm. Fourth, the patient suffered measurable damages as a result. In a missed biopsy case, the breach typically involves either a failure to obtain an adequate tissue sample or a failure to correctly interpret the pathology results.

Illinois has a specific procedural requirement before any medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. Under the Illinois Healing Art Malpractice Act, codified at 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the plaintiff’s attorney must file an affidavit with the complaint stating that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case. That reviewing professional must have determined, in a written report, that there is a reasonable and meritorious cause for the lawsuit. The reviewing professional must be knowledgeable in the relevant area of medicine and must have practiced or taught in that field within the last six years.

This requirement protects defendants from frivolous claims, but it also means your attorney must do significant groundwork before filing. At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, this process begins early. We work with medical professionals who can evaluate your records and provide the written support the law requires.

Illinois also limits punitive damages in healing art malpractice cases. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive, exemplary, vindictive, or aggravated damages are not available in medical malpractice actions. Compensatory damages for your medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering remain fully recoverable, with no statutory cap on those amounts.

Who Can Be Held Responsible for a Missed Cancer Biopsy in Chicago

Responsibility for a missed biopsy result does not always fall on a single person. The diagnostic process involves multiple providers, and a failure at any step can result in a missed cancer. Identifying every responsible party is one of the most important tasks in building a strong case.

The pathologist who reviewed the tissue sample is often a central defendant. Pathologists are trained to examine cellular structure under a microscope and identify malignant cells. When a pathologist misreads a slide, misclassifies abnormal cells as benign, or fails to note findings that warrant further testing, that error can constitute malpractice. Related errors, such as those covered under pathology misdiagnosis and incorrect tissue analysis claims, often arise from the same root failure.

The physician who performed the biopsy procedure can also bear responsibility. If the clinician failed to collect an adequate sample, used improper technique, or targeted the wrong area of tissue, the resulting false-negative may be attributed to that provider. Biopsy processing errors and specimen contamination are additional points of failure that can affect the accuracy of results.

The ordering physician, often a primary care doctor or specialist, may also share liability. If a physician received a negative biopsy result that did not match the patient’s imaging findings or clinical symptoms and failed to follow up, that failure to act on discordant results can be negligent. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, defendants whose fault is determined to be 25% or greater of total fault are jointly and severally liable for all damages, meaning they can be held responsible for the full amount of a judgment.

Hospitals and medical laboratories can also be named as defendants when their systems, staffing decisions, or quality control failures contributed to the missed diagnosis. If you were treated at a hospital near the Loop, at a facility in the North Shore suburbs, or anywhere in the greater Chicagoland area, our team can evaluate which entities may have played a role.

Illinois Filing Deadlines for Missed Cancer Biopsy Claims

Time limits in Illinois medical malpractice cases are strict, and missing a deadline can permanently bar your right to recover compensation. Understanding how these deadlines work, and when they begin to run, is critical.

Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought. In a missed biopsy case, this clock often starts running not on the date of the biopsy itself, but on the date the patient discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, that the earlier result was wrong.

In most Illinois medical malpractice cases, the deadline is two years from when the patient knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and its connection to medical care, but there is usually a four-year outside limit from the act or omission. This four-year limit is called the statute of repose. It can cut off a claim even if the patient did not discover the error until after four years had passed.

If the patient died as a result of a missed cancer diagnosis, a wrongful death claim may be available under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. Under that statute, the action must be brought by the personal representative of the deceased’s estate for the benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin. Damages may include compensation for grief, sorrow, and mental suffering, as well as pecuniary losses.

For minors, 735 ILCS 5/13-212(b) allows more time, generally up to eight years after the act or omission, but not after the minor’s 22nd birthday. This matters when a child is diagnosed with cancer that was missed in an earlier biopsy.

Do not wait to see if your symptoms improve or if another doctor will catch the mistake. Every day that passes narrows your legal options. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 to speak with an attorney about your situation.

What Compensation May Be Available in a Missed Biopsy Malpractice Case

Patients harmed by a missed cancer biopsy can suffer tremendous physical, emotional, and financial losses. Illinois law allows you to seek compensation for the full range of damages caused by the provider’s negligence.

Economic damages include past and future medical expenses, the cost of cancer treatment that would have been less intensive if the cancer had been caught earlier, lost wages during treatment and recovery, and future loss of earning capacity if the illness has affected your ability to work. These are concrete, calculable losses tied directly to the missed diagnosis.

Non-economic damages cover the pain and suffering you endured, the emotional distress of learning your cancer had been growing undetected, and the loss of a normal life during treatment. Illinois places no statutory cap on compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases, so your recovery is not arbitrarily limited.

Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, which caps the total contingent fee for a plaintiff’s attorney at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. This means your attorney’s fee comes from any recovery, and you pay nothing upfront. At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, we handle these cases on a contingency basis. You owe no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Please note that clients may still be responsible for case costs and expenses, which we will explain clearly before you retain us.

If the missed biopsy caused a patient’s death, the family may pursue a wrongful death claim. Under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, the jury may award damages that are a fair and just compensation for pecuniary injuries, including damages for grief, sorrow, and mental suffering to the surviving spouse and next of kin. Punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice wrongful death cases under Illinois law.

Cases involving multiple defendants may also involve joint and several liability. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally responsible for a plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses, regardless of their individual share of fault. A defendant whose fault is 25% or greater is also jointly and severally liable for all other damages.

Why Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles These Cases

Missed cancer biopsy cases are among the most medically complex claims in personal injury law. They require a thorough review of pathology reports, imaging studies, clinical notes, and laboratory records. They also require qualified medical experts who can explain to a judge or jury exactly where the standard of care was violated and how that violation caused the patient’s harm.

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a Chicago personal injury law firm with offices at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606. We represent injured patients and their families throughout the Chicago metro area, including communities along the lakefront, in the western suburbs, and throughout Cook County. Whether your care was provided at a major academic medical center near Grant Park, a community hospital in the suburbs, or a private clinic on the North Side, we can evaluate your case.

Our team works with independent medical professionals to satisfy the certificate of merit requirement under 735 ILCS 5/2-622 before filing any complaint. We investigate every link in the diagnostic chain, from the ordering physician to the performing clinician to the pathologist who signed the report. When laboratories or hospitals share responsibility, we pursue all liable parties.

As a medical malpractice attorney who handles cases involving delayed diagnosis, cancer misdiagnosis, laboratory errors, and pathology failures, we understand how these cases are built and how they are defended. We also understand what our clients are going through. A missed cancer diagnosis changes everything, and you deserve attorneys who take that seriously.

Call us at (312) 222-0010 or reach out online to schedule a free consultation. There is no fee unless we recover for you, and speaking with us does not create an attorney-client relationship. The consultation is simply your opportunity to get honest answers about your case.

FAQs About Missed Cancer on Biopsy Medical Malpractice in Chicago

What is the difference between a biopsy sampling error and a pathology interpretation error?

A sampling error occurs when the biopsy procedure itself fails to collect tissue from the cancerous area, so the sample analyzed by the pathologist does not contain malignant cells. A pathology interpretation error occurs when the sample does contain cancerous cells, but the pathologist fails to identify them correctly, either misclassifying them as benign or overlooking them entirely. Both types of errors can support a medical malpractice claim in Illinois, though the responsible parties may differ. In a sampling error, the clinician who performed the procedure may be the primary defendant. In an interpretation error, the pathologist is typically the central focus of the claim.

How do I know if my missed biopsy result was malpractice or just an honest mistake?

Not every diagnostic error is malpractice. Under Illinois law, the question is whether the provider’s conduct fell below the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent professional in the same field. A pathologist who misses subtle early-stage cancer that any competent pathologist would have identified may have breached that standard. A pathologist who made a reasonable judgment call on an ambiguous sample may not have. The only way to know is to have your medical records reviewed by an independent medical professional. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, this review is required before any Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can help you obtain and evaluate those records.

Can I still file a claim if my cancer was eventually diagnosed and treated?

Yes. The fact that your cancer was eventually caught does not eliminate your right to pursue a claim for the harm caused by the delay. If the missed biopsy result allowed your cancer to progress from an earlier, more treatable stage to a more advanced stage, you may have suffered real damages as a result. Those damages can include more aggressive and expensive treatment, greater physical suffering, a worse prognosis, and reduced quality of life. The key question is whether the delay in diagnosis caused measurable harm that would not have occurred if the cancer had been identified at the time of the original biopsy.

What if the person who had the missed cancer diagnosis has already passed away?

If a patient died as a result of cancer that was missed on a biopsy, the family may have a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. The action must be brought by the personal representative of the deceased’s estate for the benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin. Recoverable damages may include pecuniary losses, grief, sorrow, and mental suffering. The claim is generally subject to a two-year filing deadline measured from the date of death, though the four-year statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212 also applies. Because these deadlines interact in complex ways, families should contact an attorney as soon as possible after a loved one’s death.

How does Briskman Briskman & Greenberg charge for missed cancer biopsy cases?

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg handles missed cancer biopsy malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, Illinois law caps the total contingent fee for a plaintiff’s attorney in medical malpractice cases at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. Please be aware that clients may still be responsible for certain case costs and expenses separate from attorney fees. We will explain all fee arrangements and potential obligations clearly before you retain us. To get started, call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. As a medical malpractice lawyer serving Chicago and surrounding Illinois communities, we are here to help you understand your options.

The overall experience I had with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg was the kind that everyone should receive from any firm.

The staff stayed in contact with me via phone and email, they were very knowledgeable, they made sure I understood what was going on at all times, they answered all of my questions, were transparent, and definitely exceeded my expectations. I highly recommend them.

- Brandon Spivey

The level of care, attentiveness, empathy and concern relating to my case when dealing with Briskman Briskman and Greenberg surpassed my expectations.


They were extremely knowledgeable and fair in all matters related. They exemplified excellent customer service and care. They kept me inform and updated every step of the way and any questions I had they answered. I highly recommend using them as I would again.


- Joshua Payton

I was put to ease with the professionalism at Briskman and Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especially put my mind to rest and within a years time I have settled my case and I am very satisfied with the outcome. My injury was devastating but working with this law firm has put a lot of stressful nights to rest.


- Nakia Childs

I needed a personal injury lawyer and Gavin and his team went above and beyond.


They made the process simple and helped me in every step of the way. What I really appreciate is that they are straightforward and are quick to respond to my questions and any issues from a text or phone call. They as well continuously checked up on me. I'm happy with how they handled my case and would recommend giving them a call!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


They handled my case in a professional, sensitive and very competent manner. The staff exhibits expertise in the legal realm and provided excellent customer support and care. Thanks BBG for your help with navigating a very sensitive and challenging case for my family.


- Robin Albritton

If you were in an accident and need an excellent lawyer, talk to Paul!!

Very nice and professional lawyer that extremely cares about their clients. Fingers crossed I'm never in an accident ever again but if so, I' would definitely, 10/10 use Paul again!

- Danny S.

I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!

Robert Briskman handled my injury case very well. Funny and understanding personality and he took the time to explain everything in detail of the entire case. It was wonderful working with him. I would recommend BB&G to anyone and for myself again in the future.

- Geneva Vanderbilt

From the moment I contacted this law firm I was treated like family. 

Gavin Pearlman was honest and upfront with me throughout the process. No surprises and never kept me hanging. I strongly recommend These attorneys for your needs.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


They were extremely responsive, professional, and compassionate throughout the entire process.Their negotiations skills were exceptional, and they were able to secure a settlement that far exceeded my expectations.I am grateful to have had such a dedicated team


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

SEEN ON:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS