Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Missed Cancer on Biopsy Medical Malpractice in Chicago

A biopsy is supposed to give you a definitive answer. When a pathologist or physician misses cancer on a biopsy sample, that answer is wrong, and the consequences can be devastating. Cancer that could have been caught at Stage I or Stage II may progress to an advanced stage before anyone realizes the mistake. If you or someone you love received a false-negative biopsy result in Chicago, Illinois, you may have grounds for a medical malpractice claim against the responsible provider. The personal injury attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg represent patients harmed by diagnostic failures throughout the Chicago area.

Table of Contents

What It Means When Cancer Is Missed on a Biopsy

Missing cancer on a biopsy means a tissue sample contained cancerous cells, but the result was reported as negative or benign. The patient walks away believing they are cancer-free. Treatment is delayed. The cancer grows. By the time someone catches the error, the disease may be far more advanced and far harder to treat.

This type of error falls into a broader category of diagnostic failures. It is distinct from a delayed cancer diagnosis, where cancer is eventually detected through the same process but reported late. A missed biopsy result means the sample itself was either collected, processed, or analyzed incorrectly, producing a false-negative finding.

There are two primary ways this happens. The first is a sampling error, where the needle or instrument does not capture the malignant portion of the tissue. A biopsy may miss cancer when the needle or forceps simply does not capture the malignant portion of a lesion, which is more likely when lesions are small, irregular, difficult to visualize, or located in hard-to-reach areas. The second is a pathology interpretation error, where the sample does contain cancerous cells but the pathologist fails to identify them correctly.

Errors in cancer diagnosis are reported to occur in up to 11.8% of all reviewed cytologic-histologic specimen pairs, according to a study published in PubMed that measured the institutional frequency, cause, and clinical impact of diagnostic cancer errors. The cause of errors resulting from pathologic misinterpretation ranged from 5.0% to 50.7%, and the aggregated data demonstrated that for gynecologic and nongynecologic errors, 45% and 39%, respectively, were associated with patient harm.

These numbers represent real people, many of them right here in Chicago’s neighborhoods, from Wicker Park to Hyde Park to Beverly. When a missed biopsy result leads to advanced cancer, the legal question becomes whether the error fell below the accepted standard of medical care.

How Illinois Law Defines Medical Malpractice in Biopsy Cases

Under Illinois law, a missed cancer on biopsy can form the basis of a medical malpractice claim when a healthcare provider’s conduct fell below the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent professional in the same field. This standard applies to the physician who ordered the biopsy, the professional who performed the procedure, and the pathologist who analyzed the tissue sample.

To bring a viable claim in Illinois, a patient must establish four elements. First, the provider owed the patient a duty of care. Second, the provider breached that duty. Third, the breach caused the patient’s harm. Fourth, the patient suffered measurable damages as a result. In a missed biopsy case, the breach typically involves either a failure to obtain an adequate tissue sample or a failure to correctly interpret the pathology results.

Illinois has a specific procedural requirement before any medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. Under the Illinois Healing Art Malpractice Act, codified at 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the plaintiff’s attorney must file an affidavit with the complaint stating that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case. That reviewing professional must have determined, in a written report, that there is a reasonable and meritorious cause for the lawsuit. The reviewing professional must be knowledgeable in the relevant area of medicine and must have practiced or taught in that field within the last six years.

This requirement protects defendants from frivolous claims, but it also means your attorney must do significant groundwork before filing. At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, this process begins early. We work with medical professionals who can evaluate your records and provide the written support the law requires.

Illinois also limits punitive damages in healing art malpractice cases. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive, exemplary, vindictive, or aggravated damages are not available in medical malpractice actions. Compensatory damages for your medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering remain fully recoverable, with no statutory cap on those amounts.

Who Can Be Held Responsible for a Missed Cancer Biopsy in Chicago

Responsibility for a missed biopsy result does not always fall on a single person. The diagnostic process involves multiple providers, and a failure at any step can result in a missed cancer. Identifying every responsible party is one of the most important tasks in building a strong case.

The pathologist who reviewed the tissue sample is often a central defendant. Pathologists are trained to examine cellular structure under a microscope and identify malignant cells. When a pathologist misreads a slide, misclassifies abnormal cells as benign, or fails to note findings that warrant further testing, that error can constitute malpractice. Related errors, such as those covered under pathology misdiagnosis and incorrect tissue analysis claims, often arise from the same root failure.

The physician who performed the biopsy procedure can also bear responsibility. If the clinician failed to collect an adequate sample, used improper technique, or targeted the wrong area of tissue, the resulting false-negative may be attributed to that provider. Biopsy processing errors and specimen contamination are additional points of failure that can affect the accuracy of results.

The ordering physician, often a primary care doctor or specialist, may also share liability. If a physician received a negative biopsy result that did not match the patient’s imaging findings or clinical symptoms and failed to follow up, that failure to act on discordant results can be negligent. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, defendants whose fault is determined to be 25% or greater of total fault are jointly and severally liable for all damages, meaning they can be held responsible for the full amount of a judgment.

Hospitals and medical laboratories can also be named as defendants when their systems, staffing decisions, or quality control failures contributed to the missed diagnosis. If you were treated at a hospital near the Loop, at a facility in the North Shore suburbs, or anywhere in the greater Chicagoland area, our team can evaluate which entities may have played a role.

Illinois Filing Deadlines for Missed Cancer Biopsy Claims

Time limits in Illinois medical malpractice cases are strict, and missing a deadline can permanently bar your right to recover compensation. Understanding how these deadlines work, and when they begin to run, is critical.

Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought. In a missed biopsy case, this clock often starts running not on the date of the biopsy itself, but on the date the patient discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, that the earlier result was wrong.

In most Illinois medical malpractice cases, the deadline is two years from when the patient knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and its connection to medical care, but there is usually a four-year outside limit from the act or omission. This four-year limit is called the statute of repose. It can cut off a claim even if the patient did not discover the error until after four years had passed.

If the patient died as a result of a missed cancer diagnosis, a wrongful death claim may be available under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. Under that statute, the action must be brought by the personal representative of the deceased’s estate for the benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin. Damages may include compensation for grief, sorrow, and mental suffering, as well as pecuniary losses.

For minors, 735 ILCS 5/13-212(b) allows more time, generally up to eight years after the act or omission, but not after the minor’s 22nd birthday. This matters when a child is diagnosed with cancer that was missed in an earlier biopsy.

Do not wait to see if your symptoms improve or if another doctor will catch the mistake. Every day that passes narrows your legal options. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 to speak with an attorney about your situation.

What Compensation May Be Available in a Missed Biopsy Malpractice Case

Patients harmed by a missed cancer biopsy can suffer tremendous physical, emotional, and financial losses. Illinois law allows you to seek compensation for the full range of damages caused by the provider’s negligence.

Economic damages include past and future medical expenses, the cost of cancer treatment that would have been less intensive if the cancer had been caught earlier, lost wages during treatment and recovery, and future loss of earning capacity if the illness has affected your ability to work. These are concrete, calculable losses tied directly to the missed diagnosis.

Non-economic damages cover the pain and suffering you endured, the emotional distress of learning your cancer had been growing undetected, and the loss of a normal life during treatment. Illinois places no statutory cap on compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases, so your recovery is not arbitrarily limited.

Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, which caps the total contingent fee for a plaintiff’s attorney at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. This means your attorney’s fee comes from any recovery, and you pay nothing upfront. At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, we handle these cases on a contingency basis. You owe no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Please note that clients may still be responsible for case costs and expenses, which we will explain clearly before you retain us.

If the missed biopsy caused a patient’s death, the family may pursue a wrongful death claim. Under the Illinois Ley de homicidio culposo, the jury may award damages that are a fair and just compensation for pecuniary injuries, including damages for grief, sorrow, and mental suffering to the surviving spouse and next of kin. Punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice wrongful death cases under Illinois law.

Cases involving multiple defendants may also involve joint and several liability. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally responsible for a plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses, regardless of their individual share of fault. A defendant whose fault is 25% or greater is also jointly and severally liable for all other damages.

Why Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles These Cases

Missed cancer biopsy cases are among the most medically complex claims in personal injury law. They require a thorough review of pathology reports, imaging studies, clinical notes, and laboratory records. They also require qualified medical experts who can explain to a judge or jury exactly where the standard of care was violated and how that violation caused the patient’s harm.

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a Chicago personal injury law firm with offices at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606. We represent injured patients and their families throughout the Chicago metro area, including communities along the lakefront, in the western suburbs, and throughout Cook County. Whether your care was provided at a major academic medical center near Grant Park, a community hospital in the suburbs, or a private clinic on the North Side, we can evaluate your case.

Our team works with independent medical professionals to satisfy the certificate of merit requirement under 735 ILCS 5/2-622 before filing any complaint. We investigate every link in the diagnostic chain, from the ordering physician to the performing clinician to the pathologist who signed the report. When laboratories or hospitals share responsibility, we pursue all liable parties.

Como abogado de negligencia médica who handles cases involving delayed diagnosis, cancer misdiagnosis, laboratory errors, and pathology failures, we understand how these cases are built and how they are defended. We also understand what our clients are going through. A missed cancer diagnosis changes everything, and you deserve attorneys who take that seriously.

Call us at (312) 222-0010 or reach out online to schedule a free consultation. There is no fee unless we recover for you, and speaking with us does not create an attorney-client relationship. The consultation is simply your opportunity to get honest answers about your case.

FAQs About Missed Cancer on Biopsy Medical Malpractice in Chicago

What is the difference between a biopsy sampling error and a pathology interpretation error?

A sampling error occurs when the biopsy procedure itself fails to collect tissue from the cancerous area, so the sample analyzed by the pathologist does not contain malignant cells. A pathology interpretation error occurs when the sample does contain cancerous cells, but the pathologist fails to identify them correctly, either misclassifying them as benign or overlooking them entirely. Both types of errors can support a medical malpractice claim in Illinois, though the responsible parties may differ. In a sampling error, the clinician who performed the procedure may be the primary defendant. In an interpretation error, the pathologist is typically the central focus of the claim.

How do I know if my missed biopsy result was malpractice or just an honest mistake?

Not every diagnostic error is malpractice. Under Illinois law, the question is whether the provider’s conduct fell below the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent professional in the same field. A pathologist who misses subtle early-stage cancer that any competent pathologist would have identified may have breached that standard. A pathologist who made a reasonable judgment call on an ambiguous sample may not have. The only way to know is to have your medical records reviewed by an independent medical professional. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, this review is required before any Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can help you obtain and evaluate those records.

Can I still file a claim if my cancer was eventually diagnosed and treated?

Yes. The fact that your cancer was eventually caught does not eliminate your right to pursue a claim for the harm caused by the delay. If the missed biopsy result allowed your cancer to progress from an earlier, more treatable stage to a more advanced stage, you may have suffered real damages as a result. Those damages can include more aggressive and expensive treatment, greater physical suffering, a worse prognosis, and reduced quality of life. The key question is whether the delay in diagnosis caused measurable harm that would not have occurred if the cancer had been identified at the time of the original biopsy.

What if the person who had the missed cancer diagnosis has already passed away?

If a patient died as a result of cancer that was missed on a biopsy, the family may have a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. The action must be brought by the personal representative of the deceased’s estate for the benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin. Recoverable damages may include pecuniary losses, grief, sorrow, and mental suffering. The claim is generally subject to a two-year filing deadline measured from the date of death, though the four-year statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212 also applies. Because these deadlines interact in complex ways, families should contact an attorney as soon as possible after a loved one’s death.

How does Briskman Briskman & Greenberg charge for missed cancer biopsy cases?

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg handles missed cancer biopsy malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, Illinois law caps the total contingent fee for a plaintiff’s attorney in medical malpractice cases at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. Please be aware that clients may still be responsible for certain case costs and expenses separate from attorney fees. We will explain all fee arrangements and potential obligations clearly before you retain us. To get started, call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. As a abogado de negligencias médicas serving Chicago and surrounding Illinois communities, we are here to help you understand your options.

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS