Get a Free Consultation with a Personal Injury Lawyer

Review by T.V.

"I highly recommend BB&G ... I would give 10 stars if I could!"

T

Review by G.V.

"I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!"

G

Review by M.S.

"The attorneys at BBG were exceptional. The outcome was better than we hoped."

M

Review by R.G.

"From the moment I contacted this firm I was treated like family."

R

Review by A.H.

"We couldn't be happier with the outcome or the excellent service."

A

Review by V.A.

"We felt very secure and confident with their representation."

V

Review by J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a legal force to be reckoned with."

J

Review by T.Z.

"I'm happy with how they handled my case and recommend giving them a call!"

T

Review by K.N.

"Very easy process with the help of these amazing people. Very happy outcome!"

K

Incorrect Pathology Report Medical Malpractice in Chicago

A pathology report is one of the most important documents in medicine. When a doctor orders a biopsy or tissue sample, the pathologist’s findings drive every treatment decision that follows. An incorrect pathology report can send a patient down the wrong treatment path entirely, or leave a dangerous condition completely untreated. If you or someone you love received a wrong pathology result in Chicago, you may have a valid medical malpractice claim. The attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, a Chicago personal injury lawyer firm, are ready to review your case and help you understand your rights.

Table of Contents

What an Incorrect Pathology Report Is and Why It Causes Serious Harm

A pathology report is the written result of a pathologist’s analysis of tissue, cells, or fluid taken from a patient. Pathologists are physicians who examine these samples under a microscope to determine whether disease is present, what type it is, and how advanced it has become. Pathology is a critical part of patient care because it involves examining tissues, cells, and bodily fluids to diagnose and manage diseases, and pathologists play a vital role in providing accurate and timely diagnoses that inform treatment decisions and patient outcomes.

An incorrect pathology report happens when a pathologist misidentifies what is in a sample, misses a diagnosis entirely, or provides inaccurate details about a condition. A pathology error can steer the entire course of care, affecting what surgery is done, whether chemotherapy or radiation starts, or whether a patient is told “benign” when something malignant is present.

These errors fall into distinct categories. A false negative means the pathologist reports no disease when disease is actually present. A false positive means the pathologist reports disease when none exists. A “read wrong” report can also mean a specimen identification or labeling issue, or a communication failure where an amended diagnosis was not delivered to the treating team in time. Each type of error carries its own set of consequences. A false negative can allow cancer to grow undetected. A false positive can lead to unnecessary surgery, chemotherapy, or organ removal.

Research analyzing pathology malpractice claims found that 57% involved just five categories of specimen type and diagnostic error, including breast specimens, melanoma, cervical Papanicolaou tests, gynecologic specimens, and system errors. Sixty-three percent of claims involved a failure to diagnose cancer, resulting in delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment. These numbers make clear that pathology errors are not rare anomalies. They are a recognized pattern with real consequences for real patients.

For Chicago residents, the stakes are high. Whether you received care at a hospital near Millennium Park, on the North Shore, or anywhere across the Cook County area, an incorrect pathology report can derail your health and your life. Understanding what went wrong is the first step toward getting justice.

How Pathology Errors Happen and Who Can Be Held Responsible

Pathology errors do not happen in a vacuum. They result from specific failures at specific points in the diagnostic process, and Illinois law allows victims to pursue the parties responsible for those failures.

Processing errors occur when a specimen is mislabeled, contaminated, or mixed up with another patient’s sample before the pathologist even looks at it. Many error-reduction discussions in anatomic pathology include attention to pre-analytic and identification vulnerabilities because multiple handoffs occur before a pathologist ever sees a slide. In a busy hospital lab near the Medical District on the Near West Side of Chicago, a single labeling mistake can send a patient’s tissue sample to the wrong file entirely.

Interpretive errors happen when a pathologist looks at the correct sample but reaches the wrong conclusion. For instance, a pathologist may misdiagnose a malignant tumor as benign, leading to delayed treatment and potentially worsening the patient’s prognosis. This type of error is particularly dangerous because the patient and their treating physician have no reason to question the result.

Communication failures are a third category. While 95.2% of surveyed anatomic pathologists and laboratory medical directors reported having been involved with an error at some point in their clinical practices, only 88.8% reported disclosing an error, and a much smaller proportion, just 16.2%, reported disclosing a serious error directly to the patient it affected. When a corrected or amended report is issued but never communicated to the treating physician or the patient, the damage from the original error continues unchecked.

Responsibility for a pathology error can rest with the pathologist, the pathology group, the hospital that employs them, or some combination of all three. Liability usually depends on who provided the pathology services, whether as a hospital employee or an independent group, whether the error fell below the standard of care, and whether the mistake or delay more likely than not caused preventable harm. Under Illinois medical malpractice lawyer standards, all potentially liable parties should be identified and investigated early in the process.

Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for a plaintiff’s past and future medical expenses. Any defendant whose share of fault is 25% or greater is jointly and severally liable for all other damages as well. This matters because it can affect your ability to recover full compensation even when multiple parties share responsibility for the error.

What Illinois Law Requires to File a Pathology Malpractice Claim

Illinois has specific legal requirements for filing a medical malpractice claim, and pathology cases are no exception. Meeting these requirements is not optional. Failing to comply can get your case dismissed before it ever reaches a judge or jury.

Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the Illinois Healing Art Malpractice statute, any plaintiff filing a medical malpractice complaint must attach a certificate of merit to the complaint. This certificate is an affidavit stating that the plaintiff’s attorney has consulted with a qualified health professional who has reviewed the medical records, determined there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim, and provided a written report to that effect. The reviewing health professional must be knowledgeable in the relevant issues, must have practiced or taught in the same area of medicine within the last six years, and must be qualified by experience or demonstrated competence in the subject of the case.

For pathology malpractice claims, the written report must come from a physician licensed to practice medicine in all its branches, unless the defendant pathologist holds a specific license type that requires a reviewer with the same class of license. This requirement exists to filter out claims that lack a legitimate medical basis, but it also means your attorney needs to move quickly to secure a qualified expert reviewer before filing.

The filing deadline is equally strict. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought, with a four-year outside limit from the act or omission. In pathology cases, the clock does not always start on the date of the report. The Illinois Supreme Court in Moon v. Rhode (2016 IL 119572) confirmed that discovery requires dual knowledge, meaning awareness of an adverse medical outcome alone is insufficient, and the limitations period begins only when the plaintiff has reason to connect the injury to negligent medical care.

If you received a false negative pathology report years ago and only recently learned that cancer had been present all along, you may still have time to act. But the four-year statute of repose is an absolute outer limit in most cases. Consulting with a medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible is the only way to know for certain where you stand.

Damages You Can Recover in an Illinois Pathology Malpractice Case

When an incorrect pathology report causes real harm, Illinois law allows victims to seek compensation for the full scope of that harm. Recoverable damages fall into two broad categories: economic and non-economic.

Economic damages cover the financial losses tied directly to the error. These include past and future medical bills for treatment you needed because of the delayed or incorrect diagnosis, lost wages if the condition forced you out of work, and the cost of corrective procedures or ongoing care. If a false negative report allowed cancer to advance from an early stage to a late stage, the cost of that additional treatment can be substantial.

Non-economic damages compensate for the personal suffering caused by the error. Pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and the psychological toll of learning that your condition went undetected or was misidentified all fall into this category. Illinois does not cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, which means a jury can award what the evidence supports.

If a patient died because an incorrect pathology report allowed a fatal condition to go untreated, surviving family members may bring a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180/1. This statute allows the estate and heirs to recover damages for the loss of the person’s society, companionship, and financial support. Note that under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice cases in Illinois.

Attorney fees in medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, which caps the contingency fee at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. This means your attorney only gets paid if you win or settle, and the fee is capped by law. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg handles medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you. You may still be responsible for case costs and expenses, and we will explain those terms clearly before you sign anything.

Whether you are near the Loop, the South Side, or anywhere in the Chicago metro area served by courts at the Daley Center on Washington Street, the path to recovery starts with understanding what compensation is available to you. A medical malpractice lawyer can evaluate your damages and help you build the strongest possible case.

Pathology malpractice cases are among the most technically demanding types of medical negligence claims. They require a lawyer who understands both the science of tissue analysis and the legal standards that govern pathologist conduct in Illinois.

These cases hinge on expert testimony. You will need a qualified pathologist to review the original report, compare it against the actual sample, and explain to a jury exactly where the error occurred and why it fell below the accepted standard of care. Finding, vetting, and preparing that expert is a process that takes time and experience. The same expert must also connect the error to the harm you suffered, because Illinois courts require proof that the incorrect report more likely than not caused your injury.

Nearly half of pathology malpractice legal cases involved surgical pathology, and among surgical pathology cases overall, the most common reason for a lawsuit related to pathology was the alleged missed diagnosis of melanoma on a skin biopsy specimen. Less commonly, surgical pathology cases involved breast biopsy specimens, gynecological specimens, lung, genitourinary system, technical or pre-analytic errors such as mixed-up specimens, soft tissue, hematopathology, head and neck, gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system, or thyroid. Each of these tissue types presents its own diagnostic challenges, and the standard of care varies accordingly.

Medical records in these cases are extensive. Lab reports, chain-of-custody logs for specimens, amended reports, physician notes, and communication records all need to be gathered and analyzed. Hospitals and pathology groups have legal teams working to protect their interests from the moment a complaint is filed. You need an advocate doing the same for you.

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg has represented injured Chicagoans in serious medical malpractice claims. Our team knows how to build these cases, work with qualified medical experts, and fight for the compensation our clients deserve. If you believe a wrong pathology report harmed you or a family member, call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. There is no fee unless we recover for you.

Patients across the Chicago area, from Wicker Park to Hyde Park and from the suburbs along I-90 to the lakefront neighborhoods, deserve accurate medical diagnoses. When a pathology lab fails to deliver that accuracy, a medical malpractice attorney can help hold the responsible parties accountable. Related errors such as biopsy processing mistakes, pathology specimen mix-ups, and failures to communicate pathology results are all part of the same spectrum of negligence that can give rise to a valid claim under Illinois law. If your situation involved a delayed pathology diagnosis or a missed cancer finding on biopsy, those facts matter and they belong in front of an attorney as soon as possible.

Do not wait to get answers. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606, or call (312) 222-0010. A medical malpractice lawyer on our team will review your case at no charge and explain your options clearly and honestly.

FAQs About Incorrect Pathology Report Medical Malpractice in Chicago

What qualifies as an incorrect pathology report for a medical malpractice claim in Illinois?

An incorrect pathology report qualifies as the basis for a malpractice claim when a pathologist’s reading of a tissue, cell, or fluid sample falls below the accepted standard of care and that error causes you harm. This includes a false negative report that missed cancer, a false positive that led to unnecessary treatment or surgery, a misidentification of a tumor’s type or grade that changed your treatment plan, or a specimen mix-up that gave you another patient’s results. The key elements are that the error was a departure from what a competent pathologist would have done, and that the error caused a specific injury to you.

How long do I have to file a pathology malpractice lawsuit in Illinois?

Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), you generally have two years from the date you knew or reasonably should have known that a pathology error caused your injury. However, there is a hard outer limit of four years from the date the malpractice occurred, regardless of when you discovered it. In some cases, such as when a provider concealed the error, 735 ILCS 5/13-215 may extend the deadline to five years from the date of discovery. Because these deadlines are strict and the facts of each case affect when the clock starts, you should speak with an attorney as soon as you suspect an error occurred.

Can I sue a hospital for an incorrect pathology report, or only the pathologist?

You may be able to sue both, depending on the relationship between the pathologist and the hospital. If the pathologist is a hospital employee, the hospital can be held liable for the pathologist’s negligence under the legal theory of respondeat superior, which holds employers responsible for their employees’ actions within the scope of employment. If the pathologist is an independent contractor, the analysis is more complex, but hospitals can still face liability in some circumstances. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, all defendants found liable share responsibility for your medical expenses, and those whose fault reaches 25% or more share liability for all other damages as well.

What does Illinois require before I can file a pathology malpractice lawsuit?

Illinois requires you to attach a certificate of merit to your complaint under 735 ILCS 5/2-622. This means your attorney must consult with a qualified health professional who has reviewed your medical records and provided a written report confirming there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. The reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the same area of medicine within the last six years and must be qualified by experience or competence in the subject. For most pathology cases, the written report must come from a physician licensed to practice medicine in all its branches. Failing to include this affidavit and report can result in dismissal of your case.

What compensation can I recover if an incorrect pathology report harmed me?

You can seek both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages include past and future medical bills, lost wages, and the cost of corrective treatment made necessary by the error. Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. Illinois does not cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115. If a loved one died because of an incorrect pathology report, the family may bring a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180/1, to recover for loss of companionship and financial support. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case.

The overall experience I had with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg was the kind that everyone should receive from any firm.

The staff stayed in contact with me via phone and email, they were very knowledgeable, they made sure I understood what was going on at all times, they answered all of my questions, were transparent, and definitely exceeded my expectations. I highly recommend them.

- Brandon Spivey

The level of care, attentiveness, empathy and concern relating to my case when dealing with Briskman Briskman and Greenberg surpassed my expectations.


They were extremely knowledgeable and fair in all matters related. They exemplified excellent customer service and care. They kept me inform and updated every step of the way and any questions I had they answered. I highly recommend using them as I would again.


- Joshua Payton

I was put to ease with the professionalism at Briskman and Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especially put my mind to rest and within a years time I have settled my case and I am very satisfied with the outcome. My injury was devastating but working with this law firm has put a lot of stressful nights to rest.


- Nakia Childs

I needed a personal injury lawyer and Gavin and his team went above and beyond.


They made the process simple and helped me in every step of the way. What I really appreciate is that they are straightforward and are quick to respond to my questions and any issues from a text or phone call. They as well continuously checked up on me. I'm happy with how they handled my case and would recommend giving them a call!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


They handled my case in a professional, sensitive and very competent manner. The staff exhibits expertise in the legal realm and provided excellent customer support and care. Thanks BBG for your help with navigating a very sensitive and challenging case for my family.


- Robin Albritton

If you were in an accident and need an excellent lawyer, talk to Paul!!

Very nice and professional lawyer that extremely cares about their clients. Fingers crossed I'm never in an accident ever again but if so, I' would definitely, 10/10 use Paul again!

- Danny S.

I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!

Robert Briskman handled my injury case very well. Funny and understanding personality and he took the time to explain everything in detail of the entire case. It was wonderful working with him. I would recommend BB&G to anyone and for myself again in the future.

- Geneva Vanderbilt

From the moment I contacted this law firm I was treated like family. 

Gavin Pearlman was honest and upfront with me throughout the process. No surprises and never kept me hanging. I strongly recommend These attorneys for your needs.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


They were extremely responsive, professional, and compassionate throughout the entire process.Their negotiations skills were exceptional, and they were able to secure a settlement that far exceeded my expectations.I am grateful to have had such a dedicated team


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

SEEN ON:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS