Our Lawyers
ERCP Procedure Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago
ERCP, short for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, is one of the most technically demanding procedures in gastroenterology. When a gastroenterologist or surgeon performs it correctly, it can clear bile duct stones, relieve dangerous blockages, and even detect pancreatic cancer. When it goes wrong due to negligence, patients at Chicago-area hospitals can suffer severe pancreatitis, internal bleeding, organ perforation, and life-threatening infection. If you or someone you love was harmed during or after an ERCP procedure, you may have a medical malpractice claim under Illinois law. The attorneys at Chicago personal injury lawyer firm Briskman Briskman & Greenberg are ready to review your case and help you understand your legal options.
Table of Contents
- What ERCP Is and Why It Carries Serious Risks
- Common ERCP Procedure Errors That Lead to Medical Malpractice Claims
- Illinois Law and What You Must Prove in an ERCP Malpractice Case
- Filing Deadlines for ERCP Malpractice Claims in Illinois
- Compensation and Attorney Fees in Illinois ERCP Malpractice Cases
- Why Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles ERCP Malpractice Cases Across Chicagoland
- FAQs About ERCP Procedure Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago
What ERCP Is and Why It Carries Serious Risks
ERCP is a specialized endoscopic technique that combines endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and, more commonly, treat disorders of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. A physician passes a flexible scope through the patient’s mouth, down through the stomach, and into the small intestine to access the bile and pancreatic ducts. Through these channels, contrast material is injected to delineate ductal anatomy under fluoroscopic guidance and to facilitate interventions such as sphincterotomy, stone extraction, stricture dilation, or placement of plastic or metal stents.
ERCP carries various risks, including perforation, pancreatitis, bleeding, and infection. The use of ERCP as a diagnostic tool is not recommended because safer effective diagnostic tools are now available. Doctors today are expected to reserve ERCP for cases where the therapeutic benefit clearly outweighs the risk. Ordering it unnecessarily, or performing it without proper patient selection, is itself a form of negligence.
ERCP is a high-risk procedure with complications occurring in 10 to 15 percent of cases and mortality rates of 0.1 to 1.5 percent, depending on patient complexity. Think about what that means for a patient at Northwestern Memorial Hospital or Rush University Medical Center on the Near North Side. Even at high-volume centers, serious complications happen. When those complications result from a physician’s failure to meet the standard of care, the patient and their family deserve answers and accountability.
The benefits of ERCP over surgical treatment are well documented. However, complications including infection, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and perforation can occur even in expert hands. Several factors, such as patient selection, skill of the operator, and the complexity of the procedure, can add to the intrinsic risks of ERCP. That distinction matters in a legal case. Not every complication is malpractice. But when a complication results from a deviation from accepted medical standards, the law holds the provider responsible.
Common ERCP Procedure Errors That Lead to Medical Malpractice Claims
ERCP malpractice claims arise from a range of specific errors. Understanding these errors helps patients recognize when something may have gone wrong with their care. The most frequent types of negligence seen in ERCP cases fall into several clear categories.
Post-ERCP pancreatitis is the most common and serious complication, with an incidence rate of 3 to 15 percent, resulting from papillary swelling, mechanical trauma, thermal injury, and contrast-induced inflammation. When a physician uses excessive force during cannulation, injects contrast dye too aggressively into the pancreatic duct, or fails to use available prophylactic medications, the risk of triggering severe pancreatitis rises sharply. Post-ERCP pancreatitis can lead to severe complications, including pancreatic necrosis and organ failure, and it is a common basis for ERCP-related malpractice claims.
Perforation of the duodenum is another serious error. The most common severe complication was hemorrhage, with perforation having the highest probability of being severe, occurring in 10 out of 15 cases. Duodenal perforation is a rare but harmful complication of ERCP. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are critical to reduce morbidity and mortality. When a physician fails to recognize a perforation quickly and order the right imaging and treatment, the delay itself can be fatal.
Other common errors include performing ERCP on a patient who was not a proper candidate, failing to obtain adequate informed consent, mismanaging sedation, and failing to recognize post-procedure warning signs such as worsening abdominal pain, fever, or dropping blood pressure. Variables associated with an increased risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis include precut access papillotomy, multiple cannulation attempts, sphincterotome use, pancreatic duct manipulation, multiple pancreatic injections, guidewire use, and the extent of pancreatic duct opacification. A gastroenterologist who ignores these known risk factors during a procedure at a Chicago hospital may be liable for the resulting harm. Patients who experienced serious complications after an ERCP performed in the Streeterville medical district, the Illinois Medical District near the United Center, or any other Chicago-area hospital should have their records reviewed by a qualified attorney.
Illinois Law and What You Must Prove in an ERCP Malpractice Case
Illinois medical malpractice law sets clear rules for what a patient must establish to win a case. These rules apply whether your ERCP was performed at a large academic hospital or a smaller outpatient center near the Magnificent Mile or out in the suburbs.
To succeed in an ERCP malpractice claim, you must prove four elements. First, a doctor-patient relationship existed, creating a legal duty of care. Second, the physician breached that duty by deviating from the accepted standard of care for ERCP procedures. Third, that breach directly caused your injury. Fourth, you suffered actual damages, including medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, or other losses.
Illinois also requires a critical procedural step before your lawsuit can even be filed. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the Healing Art Malpractice statute, a plaintiff’s attorney must attach an affidavit to the complaint confirming that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case. That reviewing professional must conclude in a written report that there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. The reviewer must be knowledgeable in the relevant issues, must practice or have practiced in the same area of medicine within the last six years, and must be qualified by experience or demonstrated competence. This requirement exists to filter out baseless claims and ensure that only legitimate cases move forward.
Illinois does not allow punitive damages in medical malpractice cases. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, no punitive, exemplary, vindictive, or aggravated damages are permitted in cases where the plaintiff seeks damages by reason of medical malpractice. You can still recover full economic damages such as medical expenses and lost income, as well as non-economic damages like pain and suffering. There is no statutory cap on those damages in Illinois for general personal injury claims.
If an ERCP error caused a patient’s death, the family may pursue a claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. This statute allows surviving family members to seek compensation when a wrongful act or neglect causes death. Note that punitive damages are not available in wrongful death actions arising from healing art malpractice under this statute.
Filing Deadlines for ERCP Malpractice Claims in Illinois
Time limits are strict in Illinois medical malpractice cases, and missing a deadline means losing your right to compensation permanently. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought.
In most Illinois medical malpractice cases, the deadline is two years from when the patient knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and its connection to medical care, but there is usually a four-year outside limit from the act or omission. This four-year limit is called the statute of repose. The Illinois statute of repose imposes an absolute deadline: no medical malpractice action can be brought more than four years after the date on which the alleged act or omission occurred. After four years from the date of the malpractice, claims are barred regardless of when the injury was discovered.
ERCP complications can be tricky because patients sometimes do not immediately connect their worsening condition to a procedural error. A patient discharged from a hospital near Grant Park may develop increasing abdominal pain days later, not knowing that a missed perforation or unrecognized pancreatitis is the cause. The Illinois Supreme Court in Moon v. Rhode (2016 IL 119572) confirmed that the limitations period begins only when the plaintiff has reason to connect the injury to negligent medical care. Awareness of an adverse medical outcome alone is insufficient.
If a provider intentionally conceals the negligence, under 735 ILCS 5/13-215, victims have five years from the time they discover the fraudulent concealment to file a lawsuit. Do not wait to explore your options. Contact a medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible after you suspect something went wrong during your ERCP procedure.
Compensation and Attorney Fees in Illinois ERCP Malpractice Cases
Patients harmed by ERCP negligence can recover a wide range of damages. Economic damages include all past and future medical expenses related to the injury, lost wages during recovery, and the cost of any long-term care or rehabilitation. Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of normal life. Because there is no cap on compensatory damages in Illinois medical malpractice cases, the full extent of your losses can be put before a jury.
Consider a patient who undergoes an ERCP at a hospital along the Chicago lakefront, suffers a severe case of post-ERCP pancreatitis due to negligent technique, and spends three weeks in the ICU before developing pancreatic necrosis requiring surgery. That patient’s economic damages alone could reach hundreds of thousands of dollars. Add the non-economic component of months of agonizing pain and a changed life, and the value of the claim becomes substantial.
Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114. This statute limits the total contingent fee for a plaintiff’s attorney to no more than 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg handles medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. You should be aware, however, that clients may still be responsible for case costs and expenses. We will discuss the specifics of our fee arrangement with you at your free consultation.
Working with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer matters because ERCP cases require medical experts, thorough record review, and a deep understanding of gastroenterology standards. Our firm has the resources to build a strong case on your behalf. Call us at (312) 222-0010 to get started.
Why Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles ERCP Malpractice Cases Across Chicagoland
Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a Chicago personal injury law firm with decades of experience representing seriously injured clients throughout Cook County and the surrounding region. We handle cases arising from hospitals across the city, from Lincoln Park and Wicker Park to the South Loop, Hyde Park, and beyond. Our office is located at 205 W. Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606, just steps from the Daley Center and the Richard J. Daley Plaza, putting us at the heart of Chicago’s legal community.
ERCP malpractice cases demand serious preparation. They require obtaining and reviewing complete hospital records, working with board-certified gastroenterology experts, and building a clear timeline that shows exactly where the standard of care was breached. We take that work seriously because our clients deserve nothing less.
We represent clients in Chicago and throughout the broader metro area. Whether your procedure took place at a major academic medical center or a community hospital in the suburbs, our team is ready to evaluate your claim. Patients in communities served by our medical malpractice attorney offices throughout the region can reach us wherever they are. We also serve clients in communities like Berwyn, where our medical malpractice attorney team handles cases close to home, and in Mount Prospect, where our medical malpractice lawyer team is available to help injured patients pursue justice.
If you believe a negligent ERCP procedure injured you or a family member, do not wait. Call Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 for a free, no-obligation consultation. There is no fee unless we recover for you.
FAQs About ERCP Procedure Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago
What is the difference between an ERCP complication and ERCP malpractice?
Not every complication after an ERCP procedure means malpractice occurred. ERCP carries known risks, and complications can happen even when a physician performs the procedure correctly. Malpractice occurs when a physician deviates from the accepted standard of care, and that deviation causes the complication or makes it worse. For example, if a doctor fails to use available prophylactic medications for a high-risk patient, or fails to recognize and treat a perforation promptly, those failures may cross the line from acceptable risk into actionable negligence. A qualified attorney working with a medical expert can review your records and tell you whether the care you received met the standard.
How long do I have to file an ERCP malpractice lawsuit in Illinois?
Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), you generally have two years from the date you knew or reasonably should have known that your injury was connected to medical negligence. There is also a four-year statute of repose, meaning no claim can be filed more than four years after the negligent act regardless of when you discovered the problem. Because ERCP complications sometimes take days or weeks to fully develop, the clock can be difficult to pinpoint without legal guidance. Contact an attorney as soon as you suspect a problem to protect your right to file.
What types of compensation can I recover in an ERCP malpractice case in Illinois?
You can recover economic damages, which include all medical expenses related to treating the injury caused by the negligent ERCP, lost wages, and the cost of any future care you will need. You can also recover non-economic damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of normal life. Illinois does not cap compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases, so the full value of your losses can be presented to a jury. Punitive damages are not available in Illinois healing art malpractice cases under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115.
Do I need a medical expert to file an ERCP malpractice case in Illinois?
Yes. Illinois law under 735 ILCS 5/2-622 requires that before a medical malpractice complaint is filed, the plaintiff’s attorney must attach an affidavit confirming that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case and determined there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. That reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the same area of medicine within the last six years. This is not just a formality. Without this affidavit and the accompanying written report, the court can dismiss your case. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg works with qualified medical reviewers to meet this requirement.
Can I file a wrongful death claim if a family member died after an ERCP procedure in Illinois?
Yes. If a negligent ERCP procedure caused your family member’s death, you may be able to pursue a claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. This statute allows the surviving family to seek compensation when death results from a wrongful act or neglect that would have entitled the deceased to sue had they lived. Wrongful death claims arising from medical malpractice are also subject to a two-year statute of limitations measured from the date of death. Families should contact an attorney promptly to preserve evidence and meet all filing deadlines.
More Resources About Gastroenterology Malpractice in Chicago
SEEN ON:
