Get a Free Consultation with a Personal Injury Lawyer

Review by T.V.

"I highly recommend BB&G ... I would give 10 stars if I could!"

T

Review by G.V.

"I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!"

G

Review by M.S.

"The attorneys at BBG were exceptional. The outcome was better than we hoped."

M

Review by R.G.

"From the moment I contacted this firm I was treated like family."

R

Review by A.H.

"We couldn't be happier with the outcome or the excellent service."

A

Review by V.A.

"We felt very secure and confident with their representation."

V

Review by J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a legal force to be reckoned with."

J

Review by T.Z.

"I'm happy with how they handled my case and recommend giving them a call!"

T

Review by K.N.

"Very easy process with the help of these amazing people. Very happy outcome!"

K

Hardware Placement Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago

A hardware placement error happens when a surgeon incorrectly positions a medical device, implant, screw, rod, plate, or pin inside a patient’s body. When that error causes serious harm, it may form the basis of a medical malpractice claim under Illinois law. Patients in Chicago who have suffered because of a misplaced surgical implant deserve to know their rights, and the team at Chicago personal injury lawyer firm Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is here to help them pursue justice.

Table of Contents

What Counts as a Hardware Placement Error in Surgery

Hardware placement errors occur across a wide range of surgical procedures. Orthopedic surgeries, spinal surgeries, cardiac procedures, and joint replacement operations all involve the insertion of metal or synthetic devices into the body. When those devices are placed in the wrong position, at the wrong angle, or with the wrong technique, patients can suffer serious and lasting harm.

Improper placement of implants and hardware in orthopedic surgery occurs when devices such as screws, plates, rods, or pins are positioned inaccurately, which can result from inadequate planning, misinterpretation of imaging, or surgical error during the procedure. These are not rare edge cases. They represent a recognized category of surgical failure with documented consequences for patients.

Common examples of hardware placement errors include spinal screws placed too close to nerve roots, hip or knee implants seated at incorrect angles, pacemaker leads positioned improperly in the heart, and bone plates fixed in ways that prevent proper healing. Each of these errors can leave a patient worse off than before surgery.

Another common error involves improper placement of implants or hardware, potentially resulting in instability, pain, or the need for additional surgeries. For a patient who underwent surgery hoping to regain mobility or relieve pain, that outcome is a serious failure of care.

Hardware placement errors are distinct from product defects. If the device itself was properly designed and manufactured but placed incorrectly by the surgical team, the claim targets the surgeon’s conduct, not the manufacturer. However, if both a defective device and poor placement contributed to the injury, multiple parties may bear responsibility. A qualified medical malpractice lawyer can help identify every responsible party and build a complete picture of what went wrong.

How Illinois Law Defines Medical Malpractice for Surgical Errors

Illinois medical malpractice law requires a patient to prove four elements: that a doctor-patient relationship existed, that the provider breached the accepted standard of care, that the breach directly caused the patient’s injury, and that the injury produced measurable damages. In hardware placement cases, the central question is whether the surgeon’s technique fell below what a reasonably competent surgeon in the same field would have done under similar circumstances.

Illinois courts measure the standard of care by what a qualified surgeon in the relevant specialty would have done. For example, a spinal surgeon placing pedicle screws must follow established imaging protocols and anatomical guidelines. Deviating from those protocols without a sound clinical reason can constitute a breach of the standard of care.

One of the most important procedural requirements under Illinois law is the certificate of merit. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, a plaintiff filing a medical malpractice lawsuit must attach an affidavit to the complaint stating that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case and determined there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. That reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the same area of medicine within the last six years and must be qualified by experience or demonstrated competence in the subject matter. This requirement exists to screen out frivolous claims and ensure that every filed case has genuine medical support behind it.

This process takes time and requires careful coordination between legal counsel and medical reviewers. It is one reason why contacting an attorney as early as possible matters so much in these cases. The sooner a review begins, the better the chance of preserving critical evidence, including operative reports, imaging studies, and post-surgical records from facilities across Chicago, whether near Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Rush University Medical Center, or any other local institution.

Injuries and Damages Caused by Misplaced Surgical Hardware

The physical consequences of a hardware placement error can be severe and permanent. Misplaced screws in the spine can compress nerve roots, causing chronic pain, weakness, or paralysis. An incorrectly angled hip implant can wear unevenly, leading to bone erosion, dislocation, and the need for revision surgery. A pacemaker lead placed in the wrong cardiac position may fail to pace the heart correctly, creating life-threatening arrhythmias.

Patients may experience chronic pain from poorly placed implants or untreated complications, reduced mobility from fractures that fail to heal properly, serious infections that require additional surgeries or amputations, and psychological harm from loss of independence or long-term disability. These are not minor inconveniences. They represent life-altering changes that affect a person’s ability to work, care for their family, and enjoy daily life.

Illinois law allows injured patients to recover both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages include medical bills for corrective surgeries, rehabilitation costs, lost wages, and future care expenses. Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice cases in Illinois, so the focus of recovery is on compensatory damages that make the patient as whole as possible.

When a hardware placement error leads to a patient’s death, surviving family members may pursue a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. This statute allows the deceased person’s estate and family to seek compensation for the losses caused by the wrongful act, including loss of financial support and loss of companionship. An experienced medical malpractice attorney can evaluate whether a wrongful death claim applies alongside or instead of a personal injury claim.

Who Can Be Held Responsible for a Hardware Placement Error

Responsibility for a hardware placement error does not always rest with a single person. Surgery is a team effort, and multiple parties can contribute to an outcome that harms the patient.

The operating surgeon carries primary responsibility for the placement decision. Surgeons are trained to use imaging, anatomical landmarks, and established techniques to position hardware correctly. When a surgeon skips required imaging steps, misreads pre-operative scans, or uses improper technique in the operating room, that surgeon may be liable for the resulting harm.

Hospitals and surgical centers also bear responsibility in some cases. If a facility failed to maintain proper equipment, did not staff the operating room adequately, or lacked protocols to catch placement errors before the patient was closed, the institution may share liability. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, defendants whose fault is determined to be 25 percent or greater of the total fault are jointly and severally liable for all damages, meaning they can be held responsible for the full amount of a judgment, not just their proportionate share.

Assisting surgeons, residents, or fellows who participated in the placement may also bear some responsibility. So can device manufacturers if a defective product contributed to the error. Nursing staff who failed to flag post-surgical complications related to misplaced hardware, an issue that connects directly to broader nursing negligence concerns, may also be named in a claim. A thorough investigation is essential to identify every party whose conduct contributed to the patient’s injury. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 to discuss who may be responsible in your specific situation.

Illinois Filing Deadlines for Hardware Placement Malpractice Claims

Time limits in Illinois medical malpractice cases are strict, and missing a deadline can permanently bar a claim. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought, but there is usually a four-year outside limit from the act or omission.

Hardware placement errors can be tricky under this framework because patients do not always know right away that their implant was placed incorrectly. A patient recovering from spinal surgery near the Magnificent Mile or in a southwest Chicago suburb may assume that post-surgical pain is normal. Weeks or months later, imaging reveals that a screw is pressing on a nerve. The two-year clock under the discovery rule starts when the patient knew or reasonably should have known that the injury was connected to negligent medical care, not necessarily the day of surgery.

However, the four-year statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a) creates an absolute outer boundary. Regardless of when the injury was discovered, no medical malpractice claim can be filed more than four years after the alleged malpractice took place, and this absolute deadline applies even if the patient discovers the harm later. This means that waiting too long, even with a valid reason for not knowing sooner, can eliminate the right to file.

For minors, 735 ILCS 5/13-212(b) allows more time, generally up to eight years after the act or omission, but not after the minor’s 22nd birthday. If a child suffered harm from a hardware placement error during a pediatric procedure, parents should not assume they have unlimited time to act. Consulting an medical malpractice lawyer promptly protects the family’s options.

Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, which caps the total contingent fee at 33 1/3 percent of all sums recovered. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg handles medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients pay no attorney fees unless compensation is recovered. Clients may still be responsible for certain costs and expenses associated with litigation, which will be discussed during your consultation.

Acting quickly after discovering a hardware placement error protects your ability to build a strong case. Medical records, operative reports, imaging studies, and the hardware itself are all critical forms of evidence. The longer a patient waits, the greater the risk that records are lost, memories fade, and physical evidence becomes harder to analyze.

Hospitals and surgical centers in Chicago, from those along the lakefront to facilities serving neighborhoods like Pilsen, Logan Square, and Bronzeville, have legal teams working to protect their interests from the moment a complaint is filed. Patients need their own advocates working just as hard on their side.

The attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg work with qualified medical reviewers to assess whether a hardware placement error meets the standard required under 735 ILCS 5/2-622. The firm investigates the full chain of events, from pre-surgical planning to post-operative monitoring, to identify where the standard of care broke down. Cases involving hardware errors often overlap with related failures, such as incorrect surgical technique, failure to recognize surgical complications, or delayed treatment of those complications, all of which require careful legal and medical analysis.

If you or someone you love suffered harm after a surgical procedure involving an implant, plate, screw, rod, or other hardware device, do not wait to get answers. Reach out to an medical malpractice attorney who can review your records and explain your options. Call Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. The firm is located at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606, and serves clients throughout the Chicago area.

FAQs About Hardware Placement Errors Medical Malpractice in Chicago

What is a hardware placement error in a medical context?

A hardware placement error occurs when a surgeon incorrectly positions a medical device, such as a screw, rod, plate, pin, or implant, inside a patient’s body during surgery. The error may result from poor surgical technique, failure to use proper imaging, or inadequate pre-operative planning. When the misplacement causes physical harm, it may support a medical malpractice claim under Illinois law.

How do I know if my surgical implant was placed incorrectly?

Signs that hardware may have been misplaced include persistent or worsening pain after surgery, new neurological symptoms such as numbness or weakness, limited range of motion, implant instability, or complications that require a second surgery. A follow-up imaging study, such as an X-ray, CT scan, or MRI, can often reveal whether hardware is positioned correctly. If your surgeon or another physician identifies a placement problem, consult a medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible.

Can I file a claim if I needed a second surgery to correct the hardware?

Yes. The need for corrective or revision surgery is one of the most common consequences of hardware placement errors, and the costs and suffering associated with that additional surgery are recoverable damages in a malpractice claim. Illinois law allows injured patients to seek compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses caused by the original error and any necessary follow-up treatment.

Does Illinois law require an expert to support my malpractice claim?

Yes. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, before filing a medical malpractice lawsuit in Illinois, you must attach an affidavit stating that a qualified health professional reviewed your case and found a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. That professional must have practiced or taught in the same area of medicine within the last six years. This requirement applies to hardware placement cases just as it does to other malpractice claims, which is one reason why working with an attorney early in the process is important.

What if the hospital, not just the surgeon, contributed to my hardware placement injury?

Hospitals and surgical centers can be held liable when institutional failures, such as inadequate equipment, poor staffing, or missing safety protocols, contributed to a hardware placement error or the failure to catch it afterward. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, any defendant found to be 25 percent or more at fault may be jointly and severally liable for all of a patient’s damages. A thorough investigation of both the surgeon’s conduct and the facility’s practices is essential to identify all responsible parties and maximize the compensation available to an injured patient.

More Resources About Orthopedic Malpractice in Chicago

The overall experience I had with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg was the kind that everyone should receive from any firm.

The staff stayed in contact with me via phone and email, they were very knowledgeable, they made sure I understood what was going on at all times, they answered all of my questions, were transparent, and definitely exceeded my expectations. I highly recommend them.

- Brandon Spivey

The level of care, attentiveness, empathy and concern relating to my case when dealing with Briskman Briskman and Greenberg surpassed my expectations.


They were extremely knowledgeable and fair in all matters related. They exemplified excellent customer service and care. They kept me inform and updated every step of the way and any questions I had they answered. I highly recommend using them as I would again.


- Joshua Payton

I was put to ease with the professionalism at Briskman and Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especially put my mind to rest and within a years time I have settled my case and I am very satisfied with the outcome. My injury was devastating but working with this law firm has put a lot of stressful nights to rest.


- Nakia Childs

I needed a personal injury lawyer and Gavin and his team went above and beyond.


They made the process simple and helped me in every step of the way. What I really appreciate is that they are straightforward and are quick to respond to my questions and any issues from a text or phone call. They as well continuously checked up on me. I'm happy with how they handled my case and would recommend giving them a call!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


They handled my case in a professional, sensitive and very competent manner. The staff exhibits expertise in the legal realm and provided excellent customer support and care. Thanks BBG for your help with navigating a very sensitive and challenging case for my family.


- Robin Albritton

If you were in an accident and need an excellent lawyer, talk to Paul!!

Very nice and professional lawyer that extremely cares about their clients. Fingers crossed I'm never in an accident ever again but if so, I' would definitely, 10/10 use Paul again!

- Danny S.

I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!

Robert Briskman handled my injury case very well. Funny and understanding personality and he took the time to explain everything in detail of the entire case. It was wonderful working with him. I would recommend BB&G to anyone and for myself again in the future.

- Geneva Vanderbilt

From the moment I contacted this law firm I was treated like family. 

Gavin Pearlman was honest and upfront with me throughout the process. No surprises and never kept me hanging. I strongly recommend These attorneys for your needs.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


They were extremely responsive, professional, and compassionate throughout the entire process.Their negotiations skills were exceptional, and they were able to secure a settlement that far exceeded my expectations.I am grateful to have had such a dedicated team


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
SuperLawyers
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

SEEN ON:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS