Get a Free Consultation with a Personal Injury Lawyer

Review by T.V.

"I highly recommend BB&G ... I would give 10 stars if I could!"

T

Review by G.V.

"I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!"

G

Review by M.S.

"The attorneys at BBG were exceptional. The outcome was better than we hoped."

M

Review by R.G.

"From the moment I contacted this firm I was treated like family."

R

Review by A.H.

"We couldn't be happier with the outcome or the excellent service."

A

Review by V.A.

"We felt very secure and confident with their representation."

V

Review by J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a legal force to be reckoned with."

J

Review by T.Z.

"I'm happy with how they handled my case and recommend giving them a call!"

T

Review by K.N.

"Very easy process with the help of these amazing people. Very happy outcome!"

K
Table of Contents
    Add a header to begin generating the table of contents

    What Driving Maneuvers Cause the Most Car Accident Injuries in Chicago?

    Briskman Briskman & Greenberg's Lawyers Conducted an Independent Four-Year Analysis of 440,326 Auto Accidents

    Between January 2022 and December 2025, Chicago roads recorded 440,326 crashes that produced 96,213 total injuries, 518 fatalities, and 8,151 incapacitating injuries. Behind every one of those numbers is a real person: someone who may never fully recover, a family reshaped by a single moment of negligence, a livelihood destroyed in seconds.

    Not all car accidents are equal and they don't all take place on the most dangerous roads in Chicago. Some driving maneuvers produce injuries at dramatically higher rates than others. Some behaviors, like disregarding a traffic signal or driving the wrong way, transform what might have been a fender-bender into a life-altering collision.

    This analysis examines four years of independently reviewed City of Chicago crash data to answer a precise question: which driving maneuvers and which driver behaviors are producing the most injuries, and which are getting better or worse over time? Using crash type classifications and primary contributory cause data, we break down total injury volume, injury rates per crash, fatality severity, and year-over-year trends to surface the full picture of what is hurting people on Chicago roads. Briskman's Chicago car accident lawyers hope that sharing the findings of this report will encourage drivers to be more cautious.

    Chicago Traffic Injuries by Driving Maneuver
    Four-year analysis of 440,326 crashes across Chicago roads, 2022 through 2025
    440,326
    Total Crashes
    96,213
    Total Injuries
    518
    Fatalities
    8,151
    Incapacitating Injuries

    DID YOU KNOW...?

    Car accidents involving pedestrians in Chicago are 47 times more likely to produce a fatality than rear-end collisions, with a per-crash fatality rate of 1.31% compared to 0.03% for rear-end incidents.
    Nearly every pedestrian crash produces at least one injury (95%), and 15.91% of those injuries are incapacitating. Angle crashes, meanwhile, lead all maneuvers in total injury volume with 20,627 injuries across the study period, while disregarding traffic signals produces injuries at 3.4 times the dataset average.

    Which Driving Maneuvers Cause the Most Injuries?

    Three maneuver types dominate the injury landscape: angle crashes, turning maneuvers, and rear-end collisions. Together, these three categories account for roughly 60% of all traffic injuries recorded across Chicago from 2022 through 2025, despite representing fewer than half of all crashes.

    Angle crashes lead the field with 20,627 total injuries from 48,688 crashes, producing an injury rate of 0.42 per crash, more than double the dataset average of 0.22. These collisions occur when two vehicles meet at an intersection without one being rear-ended or turning, and the force dynamics of a broadside impact concentrate energy directly into the passenger compartment.

    Turning maneuvers produced 18,908 injuries at a rate of 0.29 per crash. For anyone who has been hurt by a driver making an unsafe turn at a Chicago intersection, an experienced Chicago personal injury lawyer can help determine whether the turning driver bore legal responsibility for the collision.

    Rear-end car accidents and crashes generated the second-highest crash volume of any type (87,689 incidents) but produced only 0.21 injuries per crash, nearly matching the dataset average. This means rear-end collisions produce enormous injury totals, 18,452 over the study period, primarily through sheer volume rather than elevated severity per incident.

    20,627
    Angle Crash Injuries
    48,688 crashes | 0.42 injury rate
    18,908
    Turning Crash Injuries
    0.29 injury rate per crash
    18,452
    Rear-End Crash Injuries
    87,689 crashes | 0.21 injury rate
    Total Injuries by Crash Type, Chicago 2022–2025
    Crash Type Total Crashes Total Injuries Injury Percentage Fatalities
    Angle 48,688 20,627 42%
    Turning 65,200 18,908 29%
    Rear End 87,689 18,452 21% 24
    Pedestrian 11,217 10,660 95% 147
    Pedalcyclist 8,389 6,248 74%
    Sideswipe Same Direction 69,933 5,595 8%
    Parked Motor Vehicle 100,401 4,899 5%
    Fixed Object 19,734 4,582 23% 97
    Head-On 3,557 2,454 69% 29
    Improper Backing 14,036 589 4% 0
    Rear to Rear 1,384 28 2%
    Injury Rate per Crash by Maneuver Type
    Pedestrian
    0.95
    Pedalcyclist
    0.74
    Head-On
    0.69
    Angle
    0.42
    Turning
    0.29
    Fixed Object
    0.23
    Rear End
    0.21
    Sideswipe
    0.08
    Parked Vehicle
    0.05
    Rear to Rear
    0.02
    Dataset average: 0.22 injuries per crash. Red bars indicate rates above average. Green bars indicate rates well below average.

    Pedestrian and Bike Accidents: The Severity Crisis

    When injury rate replaces raw count as the lens, a completely different set of maneuvers rises to the top. Pedestrian crashes stand in a category of their own. From just 11,217 crashes, they produced 10,660 injuries at a staggering rate of 0.95 injuries per crash, meaning nearly every pedestrian collision produces at least one injury.

    But the severity is what truly sets these apart. A total of 147 people were killed in pedestrian accidents in Chicago during the study period, representing 1.38% of all pedestrian crash injuries. Another 15.91% of pedestrian injuries were classified as incapacitating, the highest proportion of any high-volume crash type. Even the injuries categorized as "non-incapacitating" accounted for 61.46% of the total, suggesting that the less severe end of pedestrian crash outcomes still carries significant medical consequences.

    The fatality rate per crash for pedestrian incidents is 0.0131, making a pedestrian crash 47 times more likely to produce a fatality than a rear-end collision (0.0003 fatality rate). The data is unambiguous: vulnerable road users bear extreme disproportionate harm from traffic collisions in Chicago.

    Pedalcyclist crashes follow a similar severity pattern. Across 8,389 crashes, bike accidents in Chicago produced 6,248 injuries at a rate of 0.74 per crash, with 11.40% of those injuries classified as incapacitating. Cyclists, like pedestrians, lack the structural protection of a vehicle, and the data reflects that vulnerability with devastating clarity. Our Chicago bike accident lawyers have seen the severity of these injuries firsthand.

    Pedestrian Crashes
    95%
    Injury percentage per crash
    147 fatalities (1.38% fatality rate per injury)
    15.91% of injuries were incapacitating
    47x more likely to be fatal than a rear-end crash
    Rear-End Crashes
    21%
    Injury percentage per crash
    24 fatalities (0.13% fatality rate per injury)
    0.03% fatality rate per crash
    Highest crash volume (87,689) but lowest severity profile

    Fixed Object and Head-On Car Accidents: High Severity but Moderate Volume

    Fixed object crashes produced 4,582 injuries from 19,734 incidents, a moderate rate of 0.23 per crash. The injury rate alone does not tell the full story. Their severity profile is alarming: 2.12% of injuries were fatal (97 deaths) and 15.50% were incapacitating. When a driver leaves the roadway and strikes a fixed object, the crash almost always involves loss of control, high speed, or impairment, conditions that dramatically escalate harm.

    Head-on crashes are rare (3,557 incidents) but extraordinarily dangerous. Their injury rate of 0.69 per crash ranks second only to pedestrian crashes among collision types, with 1.18% of injuries fatal and 12.53% incapacitating. Head-on collisions were nearly 43 times more fatal per crash than rear-end incidents. In cases involving wrongful death caused by a negligent driver, these collisions often involve impairment or wrong-way driving, two of the most egregious forms of driver negligence.

    2.12%
    Fixed Object Fatality Rate
    97 deaths from 4,582 injuries
    15.50%
    Fixed Object Incapacitating Rate
    19,734 total crashes analyzed
    0.69
    Head-On Injury Rate per Crash
    43x more fatal than rear-end crashes

    The Driver Behaviors Behind Chicago's Injuries

    Failing to Yield Right-of-Way leads all identifiable causes with 18,976 injuries across 50,233 crashes at an injury rate of 0.38 per crash. This is the most common actionable cause of injury on Chicago roads, and it manifests most visibly in the angle and turning crash patterns that dominate the maneuver data above.

    Disregarding traffic signals is the most dangerous high-frequency behavior by injury rate: 0.75 injuries per crash from 8,902 crashes, producing 6,634 injuries and 42 fatalities over four years. Drivers running red lights or ignoring signals produce injuries at roughly 3.4 times the dataset average and twice the rate of failing to yield.

    Failing to reduce speed is underestimated as a mass-injury cause. With 17,562 crashes, 6,587 injuries, and 47 fatalities, it ranks among the most injurious contributory causes yet rarely receives the public attention directed at drunk driving or distracted driving. Speed-related failure to stop in time operates largely below the public radar while producing devastating consequences.

    Disregarding stop signs produced 2,149 injuries from just 4,081 crashes (0.53 injury rate) and 12 fatalities. Driving the wrong way or on the wrong side of the road, a behavior responsible for some of the most catastrophic motorcycle accidents and head-on collisions, produced 1,236 injuries from 2,730 crashes with 9 fatalities and 167 incapacitating injuries.

    Unfortunately, the data that we reviewed from the City of Chicago marked 183,133 crashes, 29,349 injuries as "Unable to Determine" so we couldn't use those insights in our analysis.

    Top Contributory Causes of Traffic Injuries, Chicago 2022–2025
    Contributory Cause Crashes Injuries Injury Rate Fatalities vs. Average
    Failing to Yield Right-of-Way 50,233 18,976 0.38 1.7x
    Disregarding Traffic Signals 8,902 6,634 0.75 42 3.4x
    Failing to Reduce Speed 17,562 6,587 0.38 47 1.7x
    Disregarding Stop Signs 4,081 2,149 0.53 12 2.4x
    Following Too Closely 9,164* 1,488* 0.16 0.7x
    Wrong Way / Wrong Side 2,730 1,236 0.45 9 2.0x
    Physical Condition of Driver 678* 413* 0.57 2.6x
    Reckless / Aggressive Driving 1,335* 366* 0.27 1.2x
    Improper Overtaking / Passing
    Improper Backing 14,036 589 0.04 0 0.2x
    * Figures marked with an asterisk reflect 2022 annual data; full four-year totals for these causes are higher. "vs. Average" compares the cause's injury rate to the 0.22 dataset average.
    Injury Rate per Crash by Driver Behavior
    Disregarding Signals
    0.75
    Physical Condition
    0.57
    Disregarding Stop Signs
    0.53
    Wrong Way / Wrong Side
    0.45
    Failing to Yield
    0.38
    Failing to Reduce Speed
    0.38
    Following Too Closely
    0.16
    Red bars indicate injury rates above the 0.22 dataset average. Green bars indicate rates below average. Disregarding traffic signals produces injuries at 3.4x the average rate.

    Where Maneuver Meets Behavior: The Deadliest Combinations

    The cross-tabulation of crash type and contributory cause reveals where risk reaches its absolute peak. The highest severe-injury rates, combining both fatal and incapacitating outcomes, occur in pedestrian and head-on crashes paired with reckless driver behaviors.

    A pedestrian struck by a driver who failed to reduce speed faces a 0.26 severe injury rate per crash, with 16 fatalities from just 450 such crashes. Pedestrian crashes combined with reckless or aggressive driving produced a 0.25 severe injury rate from 266 crashes, with 8 fatalities. These are not statistical abstractions. In nearly 1 in 4 such incidents, the outcome is fatal or life-changing.

    Head-on collisions caused by alcohol or drug impairment produced a 0.18 severe injury rate from 62 crashes. Head-on crashes involving wrong-way driving generated 550 crashes with 8 fatalities and a 0.15 severe injury rate. These combinations represent the most concentrated pockets of catastrophic harm on Chicago roads.

    Highest Severe-Injury Combinations (Fatal + Incapacitating Rate per Crash)
    Crash Type Contributory Cause Crashes Fatalities Severe Rate
    Pedestrian Improper Lane Usage 0.26
    Pedestrian Failing to Reduce Speed 450 16 0.26
    Pedestrian Reckless / Aggressive Driving 266 8 0.25
    Head-On Alcohol / Drug Impairment 62 1 0.18
    Head-On Wrong Way Driving 550 8 0.15
    "Severe Rate" is the combined fatal and incapacitating injury rate per crash. Only combinations with 50+ crashes are included for statistical stability.

    The Volume vs. Severity Paradox for Chicago Car Accidents

    The most common crash type in Chicago is also the least dangerous, and the rarest high-volume maneuvers are the most lethal. This paradox sits at the center of the injury data and explains why raw crash counts can be deeply misleading as a measure of road safety.

    Parked motor vehicle crashes are the single most common crash type in the dataset, with 100,401 incidents across four years. Yet they produce an injury percentage of just 5%, the lowest of any category, and account for only 4,899 total injuries. Sideswipe same-direction crashes follow a similar pattern: 69,933 crashes but only an 8% injury percentage. Rear-to-rear collisions are even more benign at 2% from 1,384 crashes. These are the fender-benders that dominate crash reports but contribute relatively little to the injury burden.

    At the opposite extreme, pedestrian crashes represent just 2.5% of all crashes (11,217 of 440,326) but produce 11.1% of all injuries and 28.4% of all fatalities. Head-on collisions account for less than 1% of crashes but carry a 69% injury percentage. The gap between how often a crash type occurs and how much harm it produces is enormous, and it means that policies focused on reducing total crash counts will miss the crash types producing the most catastrophic outcomes.

    Improper backing crashes illustrate the point from another angle: 14,036 incidents over four years produced just 589 injuries and zero fatalities. A city could eliminate every improper backing crash and barely move the needle on serious injury totals. Eliminating even a fraction of pedestrian or head-on crashes would save lives.

    Most Dangerous per Crash
    Pedestrian: 95% injury percentage
    11,217 crashes produced 10,660 injuries and 147 fatalities
    Pedalcyclist: 74% injury percentage
    8,389 crashes produced 6,248 injuries, 11.40% incapacitating
    Head-On: 69% injury percentage
    3,557 crashes produced 2,454 injuries and 29 fatalities
    Least Dangerous per Crash
    Rear to Rear: 2% injury percentage
    1,384 crashes produced just 28 injuries
    Improper Backing: 4% injury percentage
    14,036 crashes, 589 injuries, zero fatalities
    Parked Vehicle: 5% injury percentage
    100,401 crashes (most common type), only 4,899 injuries

    Three Types of Car Accidents Responsible for Most Fatalities in Chicago

    Of the 518 people killed in Chicago traffic crashes between 2022 and 2025, the overwhelming majority died in just three crash types. Understanding where fatalities concentrate is essential for anyone advocating for safer roads and for families trying to understand the forces that led to a loved one's death.

    Pedestrian crashes account for 147 of the 518 fatalities, or 28.4% of all traffic deaths, despite representing just 2.5% of total crashes. No other crash type comes close to this level of disproportionate lethality. The fatality rate per pedestrian crash is 1.31%, meaning roughly 1 in every 76 pedestrian crashes results in a death.

    Fixed object crashes produced 97 fatalities (18.7% of all deaths), with a fatality rate of 2.12% per injury. These crashes typically involve a vehicle leaving the roadway at high speed or under impaired conditions, striking poles, barriers, or structures. The combination of uncontrolled trajectory and rigid impact surfaces produces fatality rates that exceed even head-on collisions.

    Head-on crashes killed 29 people across 3,557 incidents, with 1.18% of injuries proving fatal. When paired with contributory causes like wrong-way driving or alcohol impairment, head-on collisions become among the deadliest events on Chicago roads. Families who have lost a loved one in any of these crash types should understand that an experienced wrongful death attorney can help hold negligent drivers accountable.

    Disregarding traffic signals and failing to reduce speed are the two deadliest driver behaviors by fatality count, producing 42 and 47 fatalities respectively. Physical condition of the driver, which captures medical emergencies and impairment-adjacent incidents, carries the highest fatality rate of any contributory cause at 1.33 deaths per 100 crashes.

    Where Chicago's 518 Traffic Fatalities Occurred, 2022–2025
    Pedestrian
    147 (28.4%)
    Fixed Object
    97 (18.7%)
    Head-On
    29 (5.6%)
    Rear End
    24 (4.6%)
    All Other Types
    221 (42.7%)
    Pedestrian crashes account for just 2.5% of all crashes but 28.4% of all fatalities. Fixed object crashes account for 4.5% of crashes but 18.7% of fatalities.
    1.31%
    Pedestrian Fatality Rate per Crash
    1 death for every 76 crashes
    2.12%
    Fixed Object Fatality Rate per Injury
    97 deaths from 4,582 injuries
    1.33%
    Physical Condition Fatality Rate
    Highest of any contributory cause

    Safety Recommendations for Chicago Drivers and Residents

    The surge in reported-not-evident injuries carries direct consequences for anyone pursuing an injury claim after a Chicago car accident. These are precisely the injuries — soft-tissue damage, whiplash, delayed-onset concussions — that insurance companies work hardest to minimize or deny. When an officer at the scene doesn't observe visible injuries, insurers seize on that gap to argue the harm isn't real, isn't serious, or wasn't caused by the crash.

    The data shows otherwise. With reported-not-evident injuries rising 47.7% over four years, it's clear that these injuries are real, they're becoming more common, and they deserve the same serious treatment as any visible wound. Victims should seek medical evaluation immediately after a crash — even if symptoms seem minor at the scene — and should consult an experienced Chicago car accident lawyer who understands how to document and prove these injuries.

    Insurance companies track these trends closely and use them to minimize payouts. When injury claim volumes are rising, insurers have even more incentive to dispute individual claims and push lowball settlements. Having an advocate who understands the full scope of what these crashes actually cost — physically, financially, and emotionally — is not optional. It's essential.

    What This Means for Chicagoans on the Road

    Intersections are the most dangerous places on Chicago roads. Angle crashes and turning maneuvers together account for nearly 41% of all injuries, and both maneuvers occur almost exclusively at intersections. Whether you are a pedestrian, cyclist, or driver, intersection behavior determines a disproportionate share of your risk.

    If you walk or bike, your risk per incident is dramatically higher. A pedestrian struck by a vehicle faces a nearly 1-in-1 chance of injury (0.95 rate) and a 1.38% chance that injury will be fatal. The data is unambiguous: vulnerable road users bear extreme disproportionate harm from traffic collisions.

    Red light and stop sign running are not minor violations. Disregarding traffic signals produces injuries at 3.4 times the average crash rate and generated 42 fatalities in the study period. Disregarding stop signs produced 12 deaths from relatively few crashes. These are among the most dangerous behaviors documented in this dataset.

    Speeding-related car accidents are a mass-injury cause operating below the public radar. With 17,562 crashes, 6,587 injuries, and 47 fatalities, failure to reduce speed ranks among the most injurious contributory causes yet rarely receives the public attention directed at impaired or distracted driving.

    What the Data Supports
    1
    Prioritize intersection safety infrastructure
    Angle and turning crashes account for 41% of all injuries. Protected turn signals, leading pedestrian intervals, and intersection redesigns targeting broadside collisions would address the single largest concentration of harm.
    2
    Expand protected pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure
    Pedestrian crashes produce a 95% injury percentage and account for 28.4% of all traffic fatalities from just 2.5% of crashes. Cyclists face a 74% injury percentage with 11.40% of injuries classified as incapacitating. These road users face injury rates 3 to 4 times higher than vehicle occupants, with dramatically higher fatality and incapacitation rates.
    3
    Strengthen camera enforcement at high-violation intersections
    Disregarding traffic signals produces injuries at 3.4x the average rate and generated 42 fatalities. Targeted enforcement at the highest-violation intersections is an evidence-based intervention supported by the concentration of harm this data reveals.
    4
    Deploy wrong-way driver detection systems
    Wrong-way driving produced 1,236 injuries, 9 fatalities, and 167 incapacitating injuries from just 2,730 crashes. Head-on collisions involving wrong-way drivers are among the deadliest crash combinations in the dataset.
    5
    Elevate speed management as a public safety priority
    Failing to reduce speed produced 6,587 injuries and 47 fatalities, ranking among the top five injury-producing behaviors. When combined with pedestrian crashes, the severe-injury rate per incident reaches 0.26, one of the highest in the dataset.

    Frequently Asked Questions About Chicago Car Accidents

    What type of car accident causes the most injuries in Chicago?

    Angle crashes cause the most total injuries of any maneuver type in Chicago, producing 20,627 injuries across 48,688 crashes between 2022 and 2025. Their injury rate of 0.42 per crash is more than double the citywide average. Turning maneuvers (18,908 injuries) and rear-end collisions (18,452 injuries) are the next highest by total volume, though rear-end crashes have a much lower per-crash injury rate of 0.21.

    How dangerous are pedestrian accidents in Chicago?

    Pedestrian accidents are the deadliest crash type in Chicago by a wide margin. Nearly every pedestrian crash produces at least one injury (0.95 injuries per crash), and 1.38% of all pedestrian crash injuries are fatal. A pedestrian accident is 47 times more likely to produce a fatality than a rear-end collision. Between 2022 and 2025, 147 people were killed and 15.91% of all pedestrian injuries were classified as incapacitating.

    What driver behaviors cause the most traffic injuries in Chicago?

    Failing to yield right-of-way is the most common actionable cause of traffic injuries in Chicago, producing 18,976 injuries from 50,233 crashes. Disregarding traffic signals is the most dangerous high-frequency behavior by injury rate, producing 0.75 injuries per crash, which is 3.4 times the citywide average, along with 42 fatalities. Failing to reduce speed, disregarding stop signs, and wrong-way driving are also among the most harmful driver behaviors identified in the data.

    Which Chicago crash types produce the most fatalities?

    Pedestrian crashes are by far the deadliest crash type in Chicago, accounting for 147 of the 518 traffic fatalities recorded between 2022 and 2025, or 28.4% of all deaths, despite representing just 2.5% of total crashes. Fixed object crashes produced 97 fatalities (18.7% of deaths), typically involving vehicles leaving the roadway at high speed. Head-on crashes killed 29 people with a fatality rate of 1.18% per injury. Among driver behaviors, failing to reduce speed (47 deaths) and disregarding traffic signals (42 deaths) are the leading fatality-producing causes.

    What should I do if I was injured in a Chicago traffic accident?

    If you have been injured in a traffic accident in Chicago, seek medical attention immediately and document the crash scene, including photographs, witness information, and the police report number. The patterns in this data show that most serious injuries result from identifiable, preventable driver behaviors such as failing to yield, running red lights, and speeding. An experienced personal injury attorney can evaluate whether the other driver's negligence caused your injuries and help you pursue compensation. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation.

    Methodology and Disclaimers

    Data Source: City of Chicago
    Analysis: Data was indexed and analyzed by CLM Sequoia, the AI marketing platform for lawyers, in partnership with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg.
    Study Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2025 (4 full calendar years).
    Record Volume: 440,326 crash records across the study period with associated injury outcome fields including total injuries, fatalities, incapacitating injuries, and non-incapacitating injuries.
    Analytical Approach: Each crash was classified by its first crash type (the initial collision maneuver or contact type, such as angle, rear end, pedestrian, or head-on) and its primary contributory cause (the driver behavior or condition identified as the primary contributor). Injury rate per crash, fatality rate per crash, and severe injury rate (combined fatal and incapacitating) were calculated for each category. Cross-tabulation analysis combined crash type with contributory cause to identify the deadliest behavior-maneuver combinations, requiring a minimum of 50 crashes per combination for statistical stability.
    Limitations: The "Unable to Determine" contributory cause category (183,133 records, 41.6% of all crashes) limits the proportion of crashes with fully actionable behavioral attribution. This report reflects crash reporting data and may be subject to classification variations across reporting officers and jurisdictions within Chicago.
    five stars gold

    The overall experience I had with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg was the kind that everyone should receive from any firm.

    The staff stayed in contact with me via phone and email, they were very knowledgeable, they made sure I understood what was going on at all times, they answered all of my questions, were transparent, and definitely exceeded my expectations. I highly recommend them.

    - Brandon Spivey

    five stars gold

    The level of care, attentiveness, empathy and concern relating to my case when dealing with Briskman Briskman and Greenberg surpassed my expectations.

    They were extremely knowledgeable and fair in all matters related. They exemplified excellent customer service and care. They kept me inform and updated every step of the way and any questions I had they answered. I highly recommend using them as I would again.

    - Joshua Payton

    five stars gold

    I was put to ease with the professionalism at Briskman and Briskman.

    Paul Greenberg especially put my mind to rest and within a years time I have settled my case and I am very satisfied with the outcome. My injury was devastating but working with this law firm has put a lot of stressful nights to rest.

    - Nakia Childs

    five stars gold

    I needed a personal injury lawyer and Gavin and his team went above and beyond.

    They made the process simple and helped me in every step of the way. What I really appreciate is that they are straightforward and are quick to respond to my questions and any issues from a text or phone call. They as well continuously checked up on me. I'm happy with how they handled my case and would recommend giving them a call!

    - Ted Zakrzewski

    five stars gold

    Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.

    They handled my case in a professional, sensitive and very competent manner. The staff exhibits expertise in the legal realm and provided excellent customer support and care. Thanks BBG for your help with navigating a very sensitive and challenging case for my family.

    - Robin Albritton

    five stars gold

    If you were in an accident and need an excellent lawyer, talk to Paul!!

    Very nice and professional lawyer that extremely cares about their clients. Fingers crossed I’m never in an accident ever again but if so, I’ would definitely, 10/10 use Paul again!

    - Danny S.

    five stars gold

    I am so very pleased with the representation from BB&G!

    Robert Briskman handled my injury case very well. Funny and understanding personality and he took the time to explain everything in detail of the entire case. It was wonderful working with him. I would recommend BB&G to anyone and for myself again in the future.

    - Geneva Vanderbilt

    five stars gold

    From the moment I contacted this law firm I was treated like family. 

    Gavin Pearlman was honest and upfront with me throughout the process. No surprises and never kept me hanging. I strongly recommend These attorneys for your needs.

    - Ron Gaber

    five stars gold

    I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.

    They were extremely responsive, professional, and compassionate throughout the entire process.Their negotiations skills were exceptional, and they were able to secure a settlement that far exceeded my expectations.I am grateful to have had such a dedicated team

    - CD

    Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
    Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
    Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
    Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

    SEEN ON:

    USA TODAY
    Associated Press
    Chicago Sun Times
    ABC NEWS
    Chicago WGN9
    NBC NEWS
    FOX32 Chicago
    CBS NEWS