Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Joint Replacement Malpractice in Chicago

Joint replacement surgery is supposed to give you your life back. Whether it’s a hip replacement at Northwestern Memorial Hospital or a knee replacement at Rush University Medical Center here in Chicago, patients trust their surgeons to get it right. When something goes wrong because of a surgical error or a failure to meet the accepted standard of care, that is not just a bad outcome. It may be medical malpractice. If you or someone you love has suffered after a joint replacement procedure in the Chicago area, Chicago abogado de lesiones personales representation from Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can help you understand your rights and pursue the compensation you deserve.

Table of Contents

What Joint Replacement Malpractice Looks Like in Chicago

Joint replacement malpractice happens when a surgeon, hospital, or other healthcare provider fails to meet the accepted standard of care during a hip, knee, shoulder, or other joint replacement procedure, and that failure causes harm to the patient. Not every complication is malpractice. But when errors are avoidable and caused by negligence, the law gives injured patients the right to seek compensation.

Common forms of joint replacement malpractice include implant sizing errors, improper implant positioning, wrong-site surgery, nerve damage caused by careless technique, failure to maintain sterile conditions, and failure to recognize or treat post-operative complications. Joint replacement errors such as using the wrong size implant, misaligning the prosthetic joint, or failing to recognize post-operative complications can leave a patient with severe pain, instability, or the need for additional surgeries to fix the mistake.

Infection is one of the most serious risks following joint replacement. Prosthetic joint infections occur in roughly 0.3% to 2% of total hip replacements and 0.5% to 5% of total knee replacements, with the highest infection rates occurring when existing prosthetic joints are replaced. When a hospital or surgical team fails to follow proper infection control protocols, a preventable infection can turn into a life-threatening crisis requiring multiple additional surgeries and long-term antibiotic treatment.

Wrong-site surgery is another recognized form of malpractice. It is common for people with severe joint pain to have damage on both sides of their bodies. While surgery may be scheduled for one hip or knee, surgeons may not realize until after completing a procedure that they operated on the wrong side, creating complications and requiring a second procedure to address the original issue.

Post-operative negligence is equally actionable. Failing to monitor for blood clots, infection, or implant failure after surgery falls below the standard of care. These are not rare or unforeseeable events. They are known risks that trained medical teams are required to watch for and manage.

How Illinois Law Defines Medical Malpractice for Joint Replacement Cases

Under Illinois law, a medical malpractice claim arises when a healthcare provider departs from the accepted standard of care and that departure causes injury to the patient. The standard of care is what a reasonably competent orthopedic surgeon, with similar training and experience, would have done under the same circumstances. Proving a departure from that standard requires expert testimony.

Before you can even file a joint replacement malpractice lawsuit in Illinois, the law imposes a specific procedural requirement. Under the Illinois Healing Art Malpractice Act, 735 ILCS 5/2-622, your attorney must attach a written affidavit to the complaint confirming that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case, reviewed the medical records, and determined there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. That reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the same area of healthcare within the last six years and must be qualified by experience or demonstrated competence in the relevant subject matter.

This certificate of merit requirement exists to screen out frivolous claims. It also means that a credible joint replacement malpractice case requires early and thorough medical review. Working with a abogado de negligencias médicas who understands this requirement from the start is critical to protecting your right to file.

Illinois does not cap compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice cases, but economic damages (medical bills, lost wages, future care costs) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering, loss of a normal life) remain fully recoverable. If multiple defendants share fault, joint and several liability rules under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 apply. Any defendant found to be 25% or more at fault is jointly and severally liable for all damages, not just their proportionate share.

Warning Signs That Your Joint Replacement May Involve Negligence

Pain after joint replacement surgery is expected during recovery. But certain symptoms go beyond normal healing and signal that something may have gone wrong due to negligence. Recognizing those warning signs early can make a significant difference in both your medical outcome and your legal options.

Persistent or worsening pain long after the expected recovery window is one of the clearest red flags. Excessive or chronic pain after joint replacement surgery can result from medical errors, and a mistake made during the preoperative process or surgery may cause the patient to experience severe pain beyond the expected post-surgery healing window.

Signs of infection, including fever, redness, swelling around the incision, or unusual drainage, demand immediate attention. Prosthetic joint infections carry a non-negligible mortality rate and usually require one or several additional surgeries along with a long course of antibiotics, resulting in significant and often lengthy functional disability.

Implant instability is another warning sign. Hip implants can fail due to improper placement or faulty design, and signs of implant failure may include pain, swelling, or a feeling of instability in the hip joint, difficulty walking on the affected leg, or clicking sounds in the hip joint.

Nerve damage symptoms, such as numbness, tingling, or weakness in the affected limb, may indicate that the surgeon damaged surrounding nerve tissue. Nerve injury is a potentially devastating complication of hip replacement surgery, especially total hip arthroplasty. These symptoms should never be dismissed as routine.

If a second orthopedic surgeon expresses concern about the condition of your joint, the positioning of hardware, or signs of an untreated complication, take that seriously. A second opinion is one of the most important steps you can take before pursuing a legal claim.

Filing Deadlines for Joint Replacement Malpractice Claims in Illinois

Illinois law sets strict deadlines for filing medical malpractice claims, and missing them means losing your right to recover compensation entirely. These deadlines are governed by 735 ILCS 5/13-212, and they apply to joint replacement malpractice cases the same as any other healing art malpractice claim.

Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action must generally be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought, with a four-year outside limit from the act or omission.

The discovery rule matters here. Joint replacement complications are not always immediately obvious. A patient may not realize that chronic pain, an unstable implant, or a post-operative infection was caused by surgical negligence until months later, perhaps after a second opinion from a specialist at Lurie Children’s Hospital or a follow-up visit at a clinic near Michigan Avenue. The Illinois Supreme Court in Moon v. Rhode (2016 IL 119572) confirmed that the limitations period begins only when the plaintiff has reason to connect the injury to negligent medical care, not simply upon awareness of an adverse outcome.

The Illinois statute of repose imposes an absolute deadline: no medical malpractice action can be brought more than four years after the date on which the alleged act or omission occurred, and after four years from the date of the malpractice, claims are barred regardless of when the injury was discovered.

If the patient died as a result of joint replacement malpractice, a wrongful death claim may be available under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180/1. That act allows the personal representative of the deceased to bring a claim for the benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin, including damages for grief, sorrow, and mental suffering. Wrongful death claims in medical malpractice cases are also subject to the two-year and four-year limits under 735 ILCS 5/13-212.

Do not wait to find out whether your deadline has passed. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 as soon as possible to have your case evaluated by a abogado de negligencia médica who understands these deadlines.

What Compensation You Can Recover in a Joint Replacement Malpractice Case

A successful joint replacement malpractice claim in Illinois can result in substantial compensation. The law allows recovery for both economic and non-economic damages, and there is no cap on either category in Illinois medical malpractice cases.

Economic damages include all past and future medical expenses related to the malpractice. Think about the cost of revision surgery, extended hospital stays, physical therapy, prescription medications, and any long-term care needs caused by the negligent procedure. If the injury forced you out of work, lost wages and reduced earning capacity are also recoverable.

Non-economic damages cover the human cost of the injury. Chronic pain, loss of mobility, inability to enjoy activities you once loved along the Chicago lakefront or in Lincoln Park, emotional distress, and loss of a normal life are all compensable. These losses are real, and Illinois law recognizes them.

When multiple parties share responsibility, including the surgeon, the hospital, the anesthesiologist, or even a manufacturer of a defective implant, Illinois law under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 determines how liability is allocated. All defendants are jointly and severally liable for past and future medical expenses. For all other damages, any defendant whose fault reaches 25% or more is jointly and severally liable, meaning you can recover the full amount from that defendant even if others cannot pay their share.

Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are regulated. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, contingent fees for plaintiff’s attorneys in medical malpractice actions are capped at 33 1/3% of all sums recovered. This means your attorney’s compensation comes from the recovery, not out of pocket. You should ask your attorney to clearly explain all fee arrangements and any costs or expenses you may be responsible for, so there are no surprises.

If you have questions about what your case may be worth, speaking with a abogado de negligencias médicas is the right first step. Every case is different, and no attorney can guarantee a specific outcome. What Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can do is give your case the thorough, honest evaluation it deserves.

Why Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Handles Joint Replacement Malpractice in Chicago

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a Chicago personal injury law firm that handles medical malpractice claims, including cases involving joint replacement errors. The firm is located at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606, in the heart of the Loop, convenient to the Daley Center and the Circuit Court of Cook County where many of these cases are litigated.

Joint replacement malpractice cases are demanding. They require medical record review, coordination with qualified orthopedic experts, compliance with the affidavit requirements under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, and a thorough understanding of how Illinois courts apply the standard of care in surgical malpractice disputes. These are not cases to handle alone or with an attorney who lacks familiarity with Illinois medical malpractice law.

The firm handles cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney’s fees unless compensation is recovered. Illinois law under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114 caps those fees at 33 1/3% of the recovery. Clients should understand that they may still be responsible for certain case-related costs and expenses, and the firm will be transparent about those terms from the beginning.

If your joint replacement surgery was performed in Chicago, Evanston, Oak Park, Naperville, or anywhere in the surrounding area, and you believe a surgical error caused you harm, reach out to a abogado de negligencia médica at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg. Call (312) 222-0010 today for a free consultation. The firm is responsible for the content of this page.

FAQs About Joint Replacement Malpractice in Chicago

How do I know if my joint replacement complications are the result of malpractice?

Not every complication after joint replacement surgery is malpractice. Complications become malpractice when they result from a healthcare provider’s failure to meet the accepted standard of care. Warning signs include persistent pain well beyond normal recovery time, signs of infection, implant instability, nerve damage symptoms, or a second surgeon expressing concern about the original procedure. A qualified medical expert must review your records to determine whether negligence occurred. Contacting an attorney early allows for a proper evaluation before evidence is lost or deadlines pass.

Who can be held responsible for joint replacement malpractice in Illinois?

Multiple parties can share liability in a joint replacement malpractice case. The operating surgeon, the hospital or surgical center, anesthesiologists, nurses, and even the manufacturer of a defective implant may all bear responsibility depending on the facts. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, any defendant found to be 25% or more at fault is jointly and severally liable for all damages, which gives injured patients stronger legal protection when multiple parties are involved.

What is the deadline to file a joint replacement malpractice lawsuit in Illinois?

Illinois law under 735 ILCS 5/13-212 gives most adult patients two years from the date they knew or reasonably should have known that a joint replacement injury was caused by medical negligence. Regardless of discovery, no claim can be filed more than four years after the date of the negligent act or omission. These deadlines are strictly enforced. Missing them bars your claim entirely, which is why speaking with an attorney as soon as you suspect malpractice is so important.

Can I recover compensation if my joint replacement required a second revision surgery due to a surgical error?

Yes. If a surgical error caused the need for revision surgery, the costs of that additional procedure, along with related medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering, are all recoverable in a malpractice claim. Illinois does not cap compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases, so the full scope of your economic and non-economic losses can be pursued. Each case is evaluated on its own facts, and results will vary depending on the specific circumstances.

Does Illinois require anything special before filing a joint replacement malpractice lawsuit?

Yes. Under the Illinois Healing Art Malpractice Act, 735 ILCS 5/2-622, a plaintiff must attach a written affidavit to the complaint at the time of filing. That affidavit must confirm that a qualified health professional, practicing or teaching in the same area of medicine within the last six years, has reviewed the case and determined there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. Failure to comply with this requirement can result in dismissal of the case. This is one of the most important reasons to work with an attorney experienced in Illinois medical malpractice law before filing.

More Resources About Orthopedic Malpractice in Chicago

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS