Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Improper Blood Sample Handling Medical Malpractice in Chicago

When a phlebotomist mislabels your blood tube, stores it at the wrong temperature, or contaminates the sample before it ever reaches the lab, the results that come back can be completely wrong. Doctors rely on those results to make life-or-death decisions. Wrong results mean wrong diagnoses, wrong treatments, and serious harm. If this happened to you or someone you love at a Chicago hospital or clinic, you may have a medical malpractice claim worth pursuing. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg has handled serious medical negligence cases for injured Chicagoans for decades, and we are ready to hear your story.

Table of Contents

What Is Improper Blood Sample Handling in a Medical Setting?

Improper blood sample handling refers to any deviation from accepted clinical standards during the collection, labeling, storage, transport, or processing of a patient’s blood specimen. Every step in that chain matters. A mistake at any point can corrupt the sample and produce test results that do not reflect the patient’s actual condition.

Common forms of mishandling include drawing blood into the wrong type of collection tube, using an alcohol-based swab at the draw site when testing for blood alcohol or certain chemical levels, failing to invert the tube the correct number of times to mix the anticoagulant, mislabeling the specimen with the wrong patient’s name, and storing the sample at an improper temperature. Phlebotomists, nurses, lab technicians, and even hospital transport staff all share responsibility for maintaining the integrity of a specimen from the moment blood leaves the patient’s vein to the moment results are reported.

The consequences of these errors are not minor. A contaminated or degraded blood sample can produce a false positive or false negative result. A mislabeled tube can cause one patient’s results to be attributed to an entirely different person. These kinds of errors connect directly to broader laboratory failures, including issues like specimen contamination and false negative laboratory results, all of which can derail a physician’s ability to make an accurate diagnosis. When a doctor at a hospital near Northwestern Memorial or Rush University Medical Center acts on corrupted lab data, the patient bears the cost of that error.

Illinois courts recognize that healthcare providers owe patients a duty of care that extends through every stage of diagnostic testing. Improper blood sample handling is a breach of that duty, and when it causes harm, it forms the basis of a medical malpractice claim.

How Improper Blood Sample Handling Causes Serious Patient Harm

The harm from a mishandled blood sample is not abstract. When lab results are wrong, doctors make decisions based on false information, and patients pay for those decisions with their health.

Consider a patient who comes into an emergency room near the Loop complaining of fatigue, confusion, and shortness of breath. Blood is drawn to check for sepsis markers, kidney function, and blood glucose. If the sample is improperly stored or contaminated, the results may come back normal when the patient is actually in crisis. A physician who sees normal results may discharge that patient, missing a life-threatening infection entirely. This kind of error overlaps with conditions like failure to diagnose sepsis and failure to diagnose bloodstream infections, where the root cause traces back to corrupted diagnostic data.

On the other side, a contaminated sample can produce a false positive. A patient might receive a cancer diagnosis, be subjected to aggressive chemotherapy, or undergo surgery, only to learn later that the original test result was wrong because the specimen was compromised. The physical and emotional toll of unnecessary treatment is enormous.

Mislabeled specimens create a different kind of danger. When Patient A’s blood is processed under Patient B’s name, both patients receive the wrong results. One may be treated for a condition they do not have. The other may go untreated for a condition they do have. This type of error has caused delayed cancer diagnoses, missed cardiac events, and failures to identify dangerous drug interactions.

Como Chicago abogado de lesiones personales with deep experience in medical negligence, Briskman Briskman & Greenberg understands how these errors ripple through a patient’s life and how to build the evidence needed to hold the responsible parties accountable.

Under Illinois law, a medical malpractice claim requires proof that a healthcare provider owed the patient a duty of care, breached that duty by falling below the accepted standard of care, and that the breach directly caused the patient’s injuries and damages. This framework applies fully to laboratory and blood collection errors.

The standard of care for blood specimen handling is defined by established clinical protocols, including guidelines from organizations like the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), as well as hospital-specific policies. When a phlebotomist or lab technician deviates from those protocols, that deviation is the breach. Proving the breach requires a qualified medical expert who can explain what the correct procedure was and how the defendant fell short of it.

Illinois Code Section 735 ILCS 5/8-2501 governs expert witness standards in medical malpractice cases. Under this statute, a court evaluates whether a proposed expert witness has the right specialty background, has devoted a substantial portion of their time to the relevant area of medicine or teaching, and is licensed in the same profession as the defendant. This means your attorney must identify and retain an expert who specifically understands laboratory science and blood specimen handling, not just a general physician.

Before your case can even be filed, Illinois requires compliance with 735 ILCS 5/2-622, known as the Healing Art Malpractice statute. This law requires the plaintiff’s attorney to attach an affidavit to the complaint stating that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case, examined the medical records, and determined in a written report that there is a reasonable and meritorious cause for the lawsuit. The reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the relevant area of healthcare within the last six years. Skipping this step means your case can be dismissed.

If you believe a mishandled blood sample led to your injury, speaking with a abogado de negligencias médicas early is critical. Building the expert foundation for these claims takes time, and the clock on your filing deadline starts sooner than most people realize.

Illinois Filing Deadlines for Blood Sample Handling Malpractice Claims

Illinois sets firm deadlines for filing medical malpractice claims, and missing them means losing your right to compensation entirely. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought.

This two-year clock does not always start on the date of the blood draw. That does not always mean two years from the date of treatment. A patient may not immediately know that a surgical complication, delayed diagnosis, medication injury, infection, birth injury, or emergency-room error was connected to negligent medical care. The discovery rule focuses on when the patient had enough information to put a reasonable person on notice that an injury may have been wrongfully caused.

However, discovery is not unlimited. Section 13-212(a) also says that, except as provided in Sections 13-215 or 13-215.1, the action may not be brought more than four years after the act, omission, or occurrence alleged to have caused the injury or death. This four-year statute of repose is an absolute outer boundary. Even if you only recently connected your illness to a lab error from five years ago, the repose period may bar your claim.

There are limited exceptions. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-215, if the person liable fraudulently concealed the cause of action from the person entitled to bring it, the action may be commenced within five years after discovery of the cause of action. If a hospital or lab actively hid the mishandling error from you, this exception may apply.

Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(b), when the person entitled to bring the action was under age 18 when the cause of action accrued, the claim generally may not be brought more than eight years after the act or omission that caused the injury or death. The statute also says that, in no event, may the action be brought after the person’s 22nd birthday.

Do not wait to see if symptoms improve. Contact a abogado de negligencia médica at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg as soon as you suspect a blood sample error contributed to your diagnosis or treatment. Every day that passes makes evidence harder to preserve and deadlines harder to meet.

Who Can Be Held Liable for Improper Blood Sample Handling in Chicago?

Multiple parties can share responsibility for a blood sample handling error, and identifying all of them is essential to recovering full compensation. Liability does not automatically stop with the individual who drew the blood.

The phlebotomist or nurse who collected the sample may be directly liable if they failed to follow proper collection technique, used the wrong tube type, or contaminated the draw site. The laboratory technician who received and processed the specimen may be liable if they failed to check labeling, stored the sample incorrectly, or ran the test on a visibly compromised specimen. The hospital or medical facility itself can be held liable under a theory of respondeat superior, meaning an employer is responsible for the negligent acts of its employees committed within the scope of their employment.

Third-party laboratory companies are also potential defendants. Many Chicago-area hospitals outsource testing to independent labs. If that lab’s handling protocols caused the error, the lab company faces direct liability. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, the Illinois Joint Liability statute, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for a plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses. Any defendant whose share of fault is 25 percent or greater is jointly and severally liable for all other damages as well. This matters because it means you can pursue full recovery even if one defendant has limited assets.

If a mishandled blood sample caused a death, the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180/1, allows surviving family members to bring a claim for damages. This statute makes the party that would have been liable for the injury equally liable when that injury results in death, giving families a legal path to justice even in the most tragic outcomes.

An experienced abogado de negligencias médicas will investigate the entire chain of custody for your blood specimen, identify every party who touched or processed the sample, and determine where the standard of care was broken. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg takes that investigative work seriously on behalf of every client.

What Compensation Can You Recover in a Blood Sample Malpractice Case?

When improper blood sample handling causes you harm, Illinois law allows you to pursue both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages cover the financial losses you can document. Non-economic damages compensate for the human cost of the injury.

Economic damages in these cases typically include the cost of additional medical treatment you needed because of the wrong diagnosis or delayed treatment, lost wages if your condition kept you from working, future medical expenses if you face ongoing care needs, and costs related to any unnecessary procedures you underwent based on faulty results. If a false positive led to chemotherapy or surgery you did not need, every dollar spent on that treatment is recoverable.

Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and the lasting impact the injury has had on your relationships and daily functioning. Illinois does not cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases, which means the jury can award an amount that genuinely reflects what you have been through.

Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are governed by 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, which caps contingent fees at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, we handle medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. You should be aware, however, that clients may still be responsible for certain case costs and expenses, which we will explain clearly during your consultation.

If you suffered harm after a blood test error at a facility anywhere from the Near North Side to the South Loop, or anywhere else in the Chicago area, reach out to a abogado de negligencia médica at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg. Call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. Our office is located at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606, and we are ready to review your case at no cost to you.

FAQs About Improper Blood Sample Handling Medical Malpractice in Chicago

Can a mislabeled blood tube really lead to a medical malpractice lawsuit in Illinois?

Yes. A mislabeled blood tube is a deviation from the standard of care that every clinical facility is required to follow. When one patient’s results are attributed to another, both patients face serious risk of harm. If that mislabeling led to a wrong diagnosis, unnecessary treatment, or a missed condition that caused you injury, Illinois law supports a medical malpractice claim. You will need a qualified expert to establish that the mislabeling fell below accepted standards and that it directly caused your harm.

How do I know if a blood sample error caused my medical problem?

This is often not obvious right away. You may suspect an error if you received a diagnosis that did not match your symptoms, if a second opinion produced dramatically different results, or if a treating physician later told you that prior test results appeared inconsistent with your actual condition. Requesting your complete medical records, including lab chain-of-custody documentation, is a good starting point. An attorney can then work with a medical expert to review those records and determine whether a handling error contributed to your outcome.

Who is responsible if an outside lab mishandled my blood sample, not the hospital itself?

Both the outside laboratory and the hospital that sent your sample there may share liability. If the hospital selected an outside lab without properly vetting its protocols, or if the hospital’s own staff failed to properly package and transport the specimen, the hospital can face liability alongside the lab. Illinois law under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 allows multiple defendants to be held jointly and severally liable for medical expenses, so you are not limited to pursuing only one party.

What if the hospital says the error was minor and did not really affect my care?

Hospitals and their insurers routinely minimize the significance of lab errors. Whether an error actually affected your care is a factual question that requires independent medical review, not the hospital’s self-assessment. If a physician made a treatment decision based on incorrect results, even a single wrong data point can have serious downstream consequences. Do not accept a hospital’s characterization of an error as minor without getting an independent evaluation from an attorney and a qualified medical expert.

Does Illinois law require anything special before I can file a blood sample malpractice lawsuit?

Yes. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the Healing Art Malpractice statute, your attorney must attach an affidavit to your complaint confirming that a qualified health professional has reviewed the facts of your case and determined in a written report that there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the lawsuit. That reviewing professional must have practiced or taught in the relevant field within the last six years. Failing to meet this requirement can result in dismissal of your case, which is one reason why working with an experienced attorney from the very beginning is so important.

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS