Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Failure to Diagnose Sepsis Medical Malpractice in Chicago

Sepsis is a medical emergency that kills faster than almost any other condition a hospital patient can face. It is the body’s extreme response to an infection, and it is a life-threatening medical emergency. When a doctor, nurse, or hospital fails to recognize the warning signs and act immediately, the consequences can be permanent organ damage, amputation, or death. If that happened to you or someone you love at a Chicago-area hospital, whether near Northwestern Memorial, Rush University Medical Center, or a community hospital along the North Shore, you may have a valid medical malpractice claim. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is a Chicago abogado de lesiones personales firm that handles serious medical malpractice cases across Illinois, and we are ready to review what happened to your family.

Table of Contents

What Failure to Diagnose Sepsis Means in a Medical Context

Failure to diagnose sepsis means a healthcare provider examined a patient who had sepsis, had access to information pointing toward that diagnosis, and still did not identify or treat it in time. This is different from a case where sepsis was simply difficult to catch. The failure must be tied to a departure from the standard of care that a reasonably competent provider would have followed under the same circumstances.

Sepsis happens when an infection you already have triggers a chain reaction throughout your body. Without fast treatment, sepsis can quickly lead to tissue damage, organ failure, and death. Hours matter. Every hour a patient goes without antibiotics and supportive care, the risk of death rises sharply.

Each year, at least 1.7 million adults and more than 18,000 children in the U.S. develop sepsis, and at least 350,000 adults and more than 1,800 children who develop sepsis die during their hospitalization or are discharged to hospice. These are not all unavoidable deaths. Many result from delayed recognition or a complete failure to diagnose the condition at all.

The CDC states that one in three people who die in the hospital setting had sepsis during their hospitalization, further proving the lethality of this diagnosis. Doctors and hospitals know this. Sepsis protocols exist in emergency departments across Chicago. When those protocols are ignored, or when a provider simply dismisses the symptoms, patients pay the price.

Common signs that should prompt a sepsis workup include fever or abnormally low body temperature, rapid heart rate, rapid breathing, confusion, and low blood pressure. A provider who sees these signs in a patient with a known or suspected infection and fails to order blood cultures, a lactate level, or prompt antibiotic therapy may have breached the standard of care.

How Illinois Law Defines a Valid Failure to Diagnose Sepsis Claim

A failure to diagnose sepsis claim in Illinois is a medical malpractice action governed by the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. To succeed, a patient or their family must prove four core elements: a duty of care existed, the provider breached that duty, the breach caused harm, and actual damages resulted.

The duty of care is established by the doctor-patient relationship. Breach means the provider’s conduct fell below the standard of a reasonably competent physician in the same specialty under the same circumstances. Causation is often the most contested element in sepsis cases, because defense attorneys will argue the patient would have suffered the same outcome regardless of an earlier diagnosis. Your legal team must show that timely diagnosis and treatment would have made a difference.

Illinois also imposes a specific procedural requirement before you can file. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, the plaintiff’s attorney must attach an affidavit to the complaint certifying that a qualified health professional has reviewed the case and determined there is a reasonable and meritorious cause for the lawsuit. That reviewing professional must practice or have practiced within the last six years in the same area of health care at issue in the case. This requirement exists to filter out frivolous claims, and it means your attorney needs to work with credible medical experts from the very beginning.

A skilled abogado de negligencias médicas will gather your complete medical records, identify the specific moments when a provider should have recognized sepsis, and work with qualified experts to document exactly how the failure caused your injuries. This kind of case requires both legal and medical knowledge working together.

Illinois Filing Deadlines for Sepsis Malpractice Cases

Illinois sets firm deadlines for medical malpractice claims, and missing them means losing your right to compensation entirely. The governing statute is 735 ILCS 5/13-212, which creates a two-part deadline framework.

The first deadline is the statute of limitations. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), an Illinois medical malpractice action generally must be brought within two years after the claimant knew, or through reasonable diligence should have known, of the injury or death for which damages are sought. In a sepsis case, that clock may start running on the date of the hospitalization, or it may start later if the connection between the medical failure and the harm was not immediately clear.

The second deadline is the statute of repose. Section 13-212(a) also says that, except as provided in Sections 13-215 or 13-215.1, the action may not be brought more than four years after the act, omission, or occurrence alleged to have caused the injury or death. This is an absolute cutoff. Even if you did not discover the malpractice until year three or four, the clock is still running from the date of the negligent act.

If the victim was a minor, different rules apply. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(b), when the person entitled to bring the action was under age 18 when the cause of action accrued, the claim generally may not be brought more than eight years after the act or omission that caused the injury or death, and in no event may the action be brought after the person’s 22nd birthday.

If the sepsis was fatal, a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act (740 ILCS 180) also applies. Under that Act, when a person’s death is caused by a wrongful act or neglect, the party who would have been liable if death had not occurred remains liable for damages. Wrongful death claims arising from medical malpractice carry their own two-year deadline, typically measured from the date of death.

Do not wait to find out which deadline applies to your case. Contact a abogado de negligencia médica at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg as soon as possible so your rights are protected.

What Damages Can You Recover in a Chicago Sepsis Malpractice Case

Illinois law allows sepsis malpractice victims to recover both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages cover measurable financial losses. Non-economic damages cover pain, suffering, disability, and loss of a normal life.

Economic damages in a sepsis case can be substantial. They include past and future medical expenses, the cost of ongoing care such as dialysis or wound care if organs were damaged, lost wages, and lost earning capacity. If a patient required ICU care, ventilator management, or multiple surgeries after a delayed diagnosis, those costs add up quickly.

Non-economic damages cover the human toll. A patient who lost limbs to septic shock, who now lives with chronic fatigue, cognitive problems, or post-sepsis syndrome, has suffered losses that go far beyond hospital bills. Illinois does not cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, which means there is no artificial ceiling on what a jury can award for pain and suffering in a sepsis malpractice case.

When multiple defendants are involved, such as an emergency room physician, a hospitalist, and the hospital itself, Illinois joint liability rules under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 determine how responsibility is shared. Under that statute, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for the plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses. Any defendant whose fault is determined to be 25% or greater of the total fault is jointly and severally liable for all other damages as well. This matters because it affects your ability to collect a full judgment even if one defendant has limited resources.

If your loved one died from undiagnosed sepsis, the Illinois Wrongful Death Act (740 ILCS 180) allows surviving family members to recover damages for grief, loss of companionship, and financial support the deceased would have provided. Note that under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice actions in Illinois.

An experienced abogado de negligencias médicas will calculate the full value of your claim, including future care costs that are easy to underestimate without proper analysis.

How Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Builds a Failure to Diagnose Sepsis Case

Building a sepsis malpractice case requires more than pointing to a bad outcome. It requires a detailed reconstruction of what the medical providers knew, when they knew it, what they did, and what they should have done differently. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg approaches each case with that level of rigor.

The first step is a thorough review of all medical records. Emergency department notes, nursing assessments, vital sign flow sheets, lab results, and physician orders all tell a story. In a sepsis case, the story often shows that warning signs were present and documented but not acted upon. A patient presenting to a Chicago emergency room with confusion, a high fever, and a recent urinary tract infection should prompt an immediate sepsis workup. When the chart shows those findings and no workup was ordered, that is evidence of a breach.

The firm then works with qualified medical experts who can testify about the standard of care and how the provider’s conduct fell short. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, that expert review must happen before the lawsuit is filed. The expert must have practiced in the relevant area of medicine within the last six years and must produce a written report supporting the claim. This is not a formality. It is a substantive gate that requires real expertise on both sides.

From there, the legal team builds the causation argument. This means showing that if the provider had ordered blood cultures and administered antibiotics within the first hour, the patient would have had a meaningfully better outcome. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s landmark 2024 report to Congress, sepsis-related hospitalizations surged 40% between 2016 and 2021, rising from 1.8 million to 2.5 million inpatient stays. Hospitals and providers know the scope of this problem. They have the tools to catch it. When they fail to use those tools, and a patient suffers as a result, that is actionable negligence.

If you were treated at a hospital in the Loop, Lincoln Park, Wicker Park, or anywhere in the Chicago metro area, and you believe sepsis was missed or ignored, call Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. Our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are capped at 33 1/3% of all sums recovered. You pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Families in the Chicagoland area, from the suburbs along I-90 to communities near Lake Michigan, deserve to know whether a loved one’s injury or death was preventable. A abogado de negligencia médica at our firm can help you find out. We also serve clients throughout Illinois, including through our abogado de negligencias médicas services in Gurnee and surrounding communities.

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is located at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606. Call us at (312) 222-0010.

FAQs About Failure to Diagnose Sepsis Medical Malpractice in Chicago

What is the difference between failure to diagnose sepsis and delayed diagnosis of sepsis?

Failure to diagnose sepsis means the condition was never identified at all during the relevant medical encounter. Delayed diagnosis of sepsis means the condition was eventually identified, but not in time to prevent serious harm. Both can form the basis of a medical malpractice claim in Illinois. The key question in either situation is whether a reasonably competent provider, given the same information, would have diagnosed and treated sepsis sooner. If the answer is yes, and the delay or failure caused measurable harm, the patient may have a valid claim under Illinois law.

Can a family file a wrongful death claim if a loved one died from undiagnosed sepsis in a Chicago hospital?

Yes. Under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act (740 ILCS 180), surviving family members can file a wrongful death claim when a person dies because of a wrongful act or neglect that would have supported a personal injury lawsuit had the person survived. If a hospital or physician failed to diagnose sepsis and the patient died as a result, the family may recover damages for grief, loss of companionship, and lost financial support. These claims generally must be filed within two years of the date of death. Families should speak with an attorney promptly, because the statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212 can also affect the available window for filing.

What evidence is most important in a failure to diagnose sepsis malpractice case?

The most important evidence includes the complete medical record from the relevant hospitalization or emergency visit. This means emergency department triage notes, nursing assessments, vital sign records, laboratory results including blood cultures and lactate levels, physician orders, and any documentation of the patient’s complaints. These records often show that the signs of sepsis were present and recorded, but no action was taken. Expert testimony from a qualified physician who practices in the same area of medicine is also required under 735 ILCS 5/2-622 before a lawsuit can be filed in Illinois. Physical evidence, witness accounts from family members, and records from any prior or subsequent hospitalizations can also support the case.

Does Illinois have a cap on damages in sepsis medical malpractice cases?

Illinois does not cap economic or non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice actions, but compensatory damages for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, disability, and loss of a normal life are not subject to any statutory limit. This means a jury can award the full amount it finds appropriate based on the evidence. In cases involving catastrophic outcomes from undiagnosed sepsis, such as limb loss, organ failure, or death, the total damages can be significant. Attorney fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are capped at 33 1/3% of all sums recovered under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114.

How long does a failure to diagnose sepsis lawsuit take in Illinois?

Medical malpractice cases in Illinois, including failure to diagnose sepsis cases, typically take one to three years from the time a lawsuit is filed to resolution. The process involves obtaining and reviewing medical records, securing expert opinions under 735 ILCS 5/2-622, filing the complaint, conducting discovery, and either settling or proceeding to trial. Cases that involve multiple defendants, such as a hospital, an emergency physician, and nursing staff, tend to take longer because of the additional complexity. Many cases resolve through settlement before trial. The timeline in any individual case depends on the specific facts, the number of defendants, and the court’s schedule. Speaking with an attorney early gives your case the best chance of a timely and thorough resolution.

More Resources About Failure to Diagnose and Delayed Diagnosis

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS