Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

When Multiple Parties Share Liability for a Daycare Injury

When your child is hurt at a Chicago daycare, your first instinct is to find out who is responsible. That is the right question to ask, but the answer is often more complicated than you might expect. In many daycare injury cases, more than one party shares the blame. The daycare center, an individual worker, a property owner, and even an equipment manufacturer can all play a role in causing a single injury. Understanding how Illinois law handles shared liability gives you a clearer picture of your rights and your path forward.

Table of Contents

How Illinois Law Defines Shared Liability Among Multiple Defendants

Illinois follows a modified joint and several liability framework under Chicago abogado de lesiones personales cases involving multiple negligent parties. The key statute is the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, Section 735 ILCS 5/2-1117. Under this law, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for a plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses, regardless of their individual share of fault.

The 25% threshold matters a great deal in these cases. Any defendant whose fault is determined to be less than 25% of the total fault is severally liable for non-medical damages only, while any defendant whose fault is 25% or greater is jointly and severally liable for all other damages. What does that mean in plain terms? If a daycare worker, a daycare operator, and a building landlord all share fault for your child’s injury, each one who carries 25% or more of the blame can be held responsible for the full amount of non-medical damages, not just their proportional share.

Illinois also uses a modified comparative fault rule under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. The contributory fault of the plaintiff reduces damages on a proportionate basis up to 50%, and if the plaintiff’s fault is greater than 50%, recovery is barred entirely. In daycare injury cases involving young children, contributory fault is rarely an issue because small children cannot legally be held responsible for their own injuries. That gives families a meaningful legal advantage when pursuing claims against multiple parties.

Illinois also recognizes the right to seek contribution between defendants under the Illinois Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors Act, 740 ILCS 100/2. A defendant may recover contribution when it has paid more than its pro rata share of the common liability. This means that even if one defendant pays a larger share of a settlement or judgment, they can pursue reimbursement from the other at-fault parties. That legal process happens between defendants and does not reduce your child’s recovery.

Who Can Be Held Liable When a Child Is Injured at a Chicago Daycare

Multiple parties can share responsibility for a single daycare injury. Identifying each one is critical to recovering the full compensation your child deserves. Chicago has hundreds of licensed daycare centers, from facilities near Lincoln Park and Wicker Park to in-home operations across neighborhoods like Pilsen and Bronzeville. Each type of operation comes with its own set of potential defendants.

The daycare center itself is usually the most obvious defendant. Under the Illinois Child Care Act of 1969, a “facility for child care” includes any person, group of persons, agency, association, organization, corporation, institution, center, or group that receives or arranges for care or placement of one or more children unrelated to the operator of the facility. Licensed centers have a duty to maintain safe premises, hire qualified staff, and follow all DCFS regulations. When they fail, they can be held liable as an organization.

Individual daycare workers can also face personal liability. A staff member who physically abused a child, failed to supervise a toddler near a stairway, or ignored a choking hazard acted negligently in their own right. Illinois law allows you to sue both the worker and the employer at the same time. The daycare operator can be held liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, which holds employers accountable for the negligent acts of employees committed within the scope of their work.

Property owners and landlords are another potential defendant. If a daycare leases space in a building, and a dangerous condition on the property caused your child’s injury, such as a broken railing on a stairway, a faulty door, or a poorly maintained floor, the landlord may share liability. Third-party liability in daycare injury cases is a real and often overlooked avenue for recovery. Equipment manufacturers can also be liable when a defective toy, crib, or piece of playground equipment causes harm, which connects directly to product liability claims under the same joint and several liability framework in 735 ILCS 5/2-1117.

How Fault Is Allocated When Multiple Parties Are Responsible

When a daycare injury case involves multiple defendants, the jury or judge assigns a percentage of fault to each party. That allocation process is not just a formality. It determines how much money each defendant owes and whether they face joint and several liability or only several (proportional) liability for non-medical damages.

Think about a scenario like this: a child suffers a serious fall from a defective climbing structure at a daycare in Chicago’s South Loop. The jury finds the daycare operator 40% at fault for inadequate supervision, the equipment manufacturer 35% at fault for a design defect, and the building landlord 25% at fault for failing to inspect the outdoor play area. All three defendants are at or above the 25% threshold, so all three are jointly and severally liable for all damages. Your family does not have to worry about collecting from each defendant separately. You can pursue the full judgment from any one of them.

The jury allocates fault only once among the plaintiff and all tortfeasors, including settled parties if the plaintiff’s fault is at issue. This matters when one defendant settles before trial. The settlement amount is factored into the overall fault calculation, and the remaining defendants receive a setoff credit for the amount already paid. Your attorney must track these credits carefully to protect your recovery.

Fault allocation also affects how defendants can seek contribution from each other after a judgment. The contribution liability of the defendants is determined by redistributing the fault of the contribution parties on a proportional basis. That internal dispute between defendants does not affect the total amount your family receives. It only affects how the defendants divide the financial burden among themselves.

The Role of the Illinois Child Care Act of 1969 in Multi-Party Claims

The Illinois Child Care Act of 1969, codified at 225 ILCS 10, creates a regulatory framework that directly supports civil liability claims against daycare operators. When a licensed daycare center violates the Act’s requirements, that violation can serve as evidence of negligence in a civil lawsuit. This is true even when multiple parties are involved, because the Act sets minimum standards that every operator must meet regardless of who else may have contributed to the harm.

The Act requires licensed facilities to maintain minimum levels of liability insurance, conduct criminal history checks through the Illinois State Police and FBI, and check the Illinois Sex Offender Registry for all employees and volunteers who work directly with children. These requirements include procedures for employee and volunteer emergency preparedness and practice drills, procedures to ensure that first aid kits are maintained and ready to use, and restrictions on handgun or weapon possession onsite. A daycare that fails to follow these requirements is not just in violation of state law. That failure can directly establish negligence in a civil case.

When a daycare violates the Child Care Act and a third party also contributes to an injury, both the regulatory violation and the third party’s negligence can be presented to a jury. For example, if a daycare in Chicago’s Rogers Park neighborhood fails to conduct proper background checks and hires a worker who later abuses a child, the daycare bears liability for the hiring failure. If that worker also acted independently in a criminal manner, the worker carries personal liability too. Both claims can proceed simultaneously. Families do not have to choose one defendant over another.

DCFS licensing violations documented in inspection records from facilities across Cook County can be powerful evidence in these multi-party cases. Inspection reports, incident logs, and staff training records all help establish which parties failed in their duties and by how much. These records are often central to the fault allocation process that determines what each defendant ultimately owes.

Why Identifying Every Liable Party Matters for Your Child’s Recovery

Pursuing every responsible party is not about being aggressive. It is about making sure your child has access to the full compensation they need for medical care, therapy, and long-term recovery. Daycare injuries can be serious. Head injuries, broken bones, burns, and cases of abuse or neglect can require years of treatment. The costs add up fast, and one defendant’s insurance policy may not cover everything.

When multiple defendants are named in a lawsuit, you access multiple insurance policies and multiple sources of financial recovery. A daycare center may carry general liability insurance. A property owner may carry a separate premises liability policy. An equipment manufacturer may carry product liability coverage. Naming all responsible parties from the start protects your family from hitting a coverage wall midway through a case.

There is also a practical legal reason to identify every defendant early. Illinois has a statute of limitations for personal injury claims, and missing a deadline against even one defendant can permanently bar that part of your recovery. For claims involving minors, Illinois generally tolls the statute of limitations until the child turns 18, but there are exceptions and nuances that make early legal action the safer choice. Claims against government entities, for example, require notice within much shorter timeframes.

The Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180, applies when a child dies as a result of daycare negligence. In those heartbreaking situations, the same principles of shared liability and fault allocation apply, and every responsible party can be named in the wrongful death action. No family should face those circumstances without a thorough investigation into every party who may have contributed to the loss.

At Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, we represent families throughout Chicago and Cook County in daycare injury cases. If your child was hurt, call us at (312) 222-0010 to discuss your situation. Our office is located at 35 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1730, Chicago, IL 60601. There is no fee unless we recover for you, but you may still be responsible for certain costs and expenses, which we will explain clearly before you make any decisions.

FAQs About When Multiple Parties Share Liability for a Daycare Injury in Chicago

Can I sue both the daycare center and an individual worker at the same time in Illinois?

Yes. Illinois law allows you to name both the daycare organization and the individual employee as defendants in the same lawsuit. The employer can be held liable under respondeat superior for the worker’s negligent acts committed during the course of employment. The worker can also face personal liability for their own conduct. Naming both parties gives your family access to more potential sources of recovery and ensures that all responsible parties are held accountable through the legal process.

What happens if one of the defendants settles before trial?

When one defendant settles before trial, the settlement amount is taken into account during the fault allocation process. The remaining defendants typically receive a credit for the amount already paid by the settling party. The jury still evaluates the fault of all parties, including those who settled, to determine the overall percentage each one contributed to the injury. Your total recovery is not automatically reduced dollar-for-dollar by the settlement amount, but the specific impact depends on how the court applies Illinois contribution law under 740 ILCS 100/2.

Does the 25% fault threshold under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 affect how much my family can recover?

The 25% threshold affects which defendants are jointly and severally liable for non-medical damages. All defendants found liable, regardless of their percentage, are jointly and severally liable for your child’s past and future medical expenses. For non-medical damages like pain and suffering, only defendants found to be 25% or more at fault can be held jointly and severally liable. Defendants below that threshold are only responsible for their proportional share of non-medical damages. This distinction matters most when one defendant has limited financial resources or insurance coverage.

Can the building landlord be sued if the daycare rents the space where my child was injured?

Yes, in many cases. A landlord who owns the property where a daycare operates has a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition. If a dangerous condition on the property, such as a broken stairway, a faulty door, or a hazardous surface, contributed to your child’s injury, the landlord may share liability alongside the daycare operator. The specific facts of the injury and the terms of the lease agreement between the daycare and the landlord can affect how fault is allocated between them. An attorney can investigate the property records and lease terms to determine the landlord’s potential liability.

How does Illinois law handle cases where a defective product and daycare negligence both caused my child’s injury?

Illinois law allows both types of claims to proceed in the same lawsuit. If a defective piece of equipment, such as a crib, a toy, or a piece of playground equipment, contributed to the injury alongside the daycare’s failure to supervise, you can pursue a negligence claim against the daycare and a product liability claim against the manufacturer at the same time. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for medical expenses, and those with 25% or more fault are jointly and severally liable for all other damages. This means your family does not have to prove one theory at the expense of the other. Both can be presented to a jury together.

More Resources About Who Can Be Held Legally Responsible for Daycare Injuries

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS