Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Small Parts and Swallowing Injuries at Chicago Daycares

Every parent who drops a child off at a Chicago daycare trusts that the facility is safe, clean, and free of dangers. Small parts and swallowing injuries shatter that trust fast. A toddler in Wicker Park, a preschooler near Lincoln Park, or an infant in Pilsen can all face the same risk: a tiny object that should never have been within reach. When a daycare fails to control that risk, the consequences can be life-altering, and the law holds those facilities accountable.

Table of Contents

Why Small Parts Are So Dangerous for Young Children

Young children explore the world through their mouths. That is simply how toddlers and infants learn. The problem is that anything small enough to fit in a child’s hand is often small enough to swallow or inhale. Under federal standards, a “small part” is any object that fits completely into the CPSC’s small parts test cylinder, which approximates the size of the fully expanded throat of a child under three years old. That means a game piece, a button, a coin, or even a broken toy fragment can block an airway or pass into the digestive tract and cause serious internal damage.

The physical consequences of swallowing a small object vary widely. Some objects pass through without incident. Others cause choking, airway obstruction, or internal lacerations. Magnets are especially dangerous because they can attach to each other across intestinal walls, causing obstructions and perforations within the gastrointestinal tract. A child who swallows two or more magnets at different times faces a genuine surgical emergency. Button batteries carry similar risks, causing chemical burns to soft tissue within hours of ingestion.

The danger is not limited to obvious toy parts. Toys can contain chemicals of concern such as lead, phthalates found in PVC plastics, cadmium, and mercury, and when children put toys in their mouths, they may be exposed to these chemicals. At a Chicago daycare, where dozens of children share a common space, the volume and variety of objects in circulation makes constant vigilance essential. A single lapse in supervision, a broken toy left on a rug, or a craft supply left out after an activity can result in a serious injury in seconds.

Caregivers must also recognize that children occasionally choke on toys or toy parts that meet federal standards, so caregivers and teachers must constantly be vigilant. Passing a safety test does not eliminate all risk. Active, attentive supervision is the only real protection, and that is exactly what Illinois law requires daycares to provide.

Federal and Illinois Laws That Govern Small Parts Safety at Daycares

Daycares in Chicago operate under both federal product safety law and Illinois state licensing rules. Both layers of law create clear obligations, and a violation of either can support a negligence claim when a child is injured.

At the federal level, children’s products intended for use by children under 3 that present a choking, aspiration, or ingestion hazard because of small parts are banned hazardous substances, and this small parts ban is codified at 16 C.F.R. Part 1501. Section 1500.18(a)(9) classifies as a banned hazardous substance any toy or other article intended for use by children under 3 years of age that presents a choking, aspiration, or ingestion hazard because of small parts. This means a daycare that allows children under three to access toys or materials that fall under this ban is already operating in violation of federal law.

At the state level, the Chicago abogado de lesiones personales community frequently references the Illinois Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10) as the foundational statute governing daycare obligations. Under this Act, the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) has the authority to license and regulate day care centers across the state. DCFS Rule 407, the Licensing Standards for Day Care Centers, sets out specific requirements for the physical environment of a licensed facility, including the obligation to keep the space free from hazards. DCFS inspectors evaluate whether facilities maintain childproofed spaces free from hazards like choking risks as part of the licensing process.

According to the federal government’s small parts standard for children under three years of age, a safe-size toy part should be at least one and one-quarter inches in diameter and between one and two and one-quarter inches long; any part smaller than this presents a potential choking hazard. Daycares that stock toys without checking these specifications, or that allow older children’s toys to mix with infant and toddler play areas, are creating preventable hazards that violate both state and federal standards.

How Daycare Negligence Leads to Swallowing Injuries

Negligence in a daycare context is not always dramatic. It rarely involves a single obvious mistake. More often, it is a pattern of small failures that combine to put a child in danger. Understanding how these failures happen helps parents recognize what went wrong and why the daycare may be legally responsible.

The most common failure is inadequate supervision. A caregiver who is distracted, understaffed, or simply inattentive cannot monitor every child’s hands and mouth at all times. Illinois DCFS Rule 407 sets staff-to-child ratio requirements specifically because the number of adults present directly affects the quality of supervision. When a daycare violates those ratios, the risk of an undetected swallowing incident increases sharply. A child near a craft table at a Pilsen daycare or on a play mat at a facility near the Magnificent Mile can access a hazardous object in seconds if no one is watching.

Toy management is another common failure point. Daycares often serve children of different ages in shared spaces. A puzzle designed for a five-year-old contains pieces that are banned hazardous substances for a two-year-old. According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, small parts and products with small parts intended for children under 3 are subject to the small parts ban, and small parts meant for children aged 3 to 8 must carry warning labels. A daycare that mixes age groups without separating age-appropriate materials is creating a foreseeable risk.

Broken or worn toys are a third failure. A toy that passed safety standards when new can become dangerous when a piece breaks off. The test method under 16 C.F.R. Part 1501 determines whether an article is hazardous to children under 3 because it, or one of its components that can be detached or broken off during normal or reasonable foreseeable use, is too small. Daycares have a duty to inspect toys regularly and remove any that have broken apart. Failure to do so is a form of negligent premises maintenance that can support a personal injury claim under Illinois law.

What Injuries Can Result and What Damages Are Recoverable

The physical harm from swallowing a small object ranges from mild discomfort to catastrophic internal injury. A child who swallows a smooth, non-toxic object may pass it without medical intervention. But many swallowing incidents require emergency room visits, imaging studies, endoscopic procedures, or surgery. Some cause permanent damage to the esophagus, stomach, or intestines. A child who swallows a button battery, for example, can suffer severe chemical burns to the esophagus within two hours of ingestion, sometimes requiring reconstructive surgery and long-term feeding support.

When a daycare’s negligence causes these injuries, Illinois law allows families to pursue compensation for all resulting harm. Medical expenses are recoverable, including emergency treatment, hospitalization, surgical costs, specialist visits, and any future care the child will need. Pain and suffering damages compensate for the physical pain the child endured and the emotional trauma that follows. Parents who miss work to care for an injured child may also recover lost wages.

In cases involving gross negligence, such as a daycare that knowingly kept banned hazardous materials accessible to infants, punitive damages may be available under Illinois law. These damages go beyond compensating the family. They are designed to punish especially reckless conduct and deter other facilities from similar behavior. Illinois courts have discretion to award punitive damages when a defendant’s conduct shows a conscious disregard for the safety of others.

It is also worth noting that liability does not always rest solely with the daycare operator. If a defective toy caused or contributed to the injury, the toy’s manufacturer or distributor may share responsibility. Section 14(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act requires manufacturers and importers of children’s products subject to a regulation, standard, or ban enforced by the CPSC to certify that those products meet the applicable requirements. A manufacturer that certifies a non-compliant product may face product liability claims alongside any negligence claim against the daycare itself.

Steps to Take After Your Child Swallows a Small Object at a Chicago Daycare

If you learn that your child swallowed or nearly swallowed a small object at a Chicago daycare, the order of your next steps matters. Acting quickly and in the right sequence protects both your child’s health and your legal rights.

First, get your child to a doctor or emergency room immediately, even if the child seems fine. Many internal injuries from swallowed objects are not obvious at first. A physician can use imaging to locate the object and assess whether it poses an ongoing risk. Do not wait for symptoms to develop. Button batteries and magnets in particular require urgent evaluation.

Second, notify the daycare in writing that the incident occurred. Ask for a written incident report. Under Illinois DCFS regulations, licensed day care centers are required to document injuries and incidents. If the daycare refuses to provide documentation, note that refusal. It is relevant evidence of how the facility operates.

Third, photograph any object that may have caused the injury. If the daycare still has the item, ask for it to be preserved. Document the area where the incident occurred. If your child’s injury resulted from a broken toy, keep the toy if possible. Physical evidence is often the most powerful proof in these cases.

Fourth, report the incident to the Illinois DCFS. You can file a licensing complaint by calling the Child Abuse Hotline at 1-800-252-2873. A DCFS licensing representative will investigate and may uncover a pattern of safety violations that strengthens your legal claim. DCFS inspection records from Chicago facilities are public documents that can be accessed and used as evidence.

Finally, contact an attorney before speaking with the daycare’s insurance company. Insurers move quickly to limit claims. Speaking without legal guidance can hurt your case. The attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg are ready to review what happened and advise you on your options. Call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation. Our firm is located in Chicago and serves families throughout the city and surrounding communities.

FAQs About Small Parts and Swallowing Injuries at Chicago Daycares

What federal law bans small parts toys at daycares for children under three?

The Consumer Product Safety Commission enforces the small parts ban under 16 C.F.R. Part 1501, which prohibits toys and children’s products intended for use by children under 36 months of age that present a choking, aspiration, or ingestion hazard because of small parts. This is codified in 16 C.F.R. § 1500.18(a)(9). A daycare that allows infants or toddlers to access toys covered by this ban is violating federal product safety law, which is directly relevant to any negligence claim.

Can I sue a Chicago daycare if my child swallowed a small object but was not seriously injured?

Illinois law allows personal injury claims when a child suffers harm due to a daycare’s negligence. If your child required any medical treatment, including an ER visit, imaging, or a procedure to remove the object, those costs are recoverable. Even if the physical injury seems minor, the incident may reflect a pattern of unsafe practices at the facility. An attorney can help you evaluate the full scope of your potential claim, including any emotional distress your child experienced as a result.

What Illinois law governs how Chicago daycares must manage toy safety?

The Illinois Child Care Act of 1969 (225 ILCS 10) is the primary state statute governing daycare licensing and safety obligations. Under this Act, DCFS has authority to set and enforce licensing standards through Rule 407 for day care centers and Rule 408 for group day care homes. These rules require licensed facilities to maintain safe environments free from hazards, including choking risks. Violations of these rules can serve as evidence of negligence in a civil lawsuit.

How long do I have to file a lawsuit after my child is injured at a Chicago daycare?

In Illinois, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims is generally two years from the date of injury for adults. However, for minors, the clock typically does not begin running until the child turns 18, which means a claim may be filed up until the child’s 20th birthday in many cases. That said, evidence fades and witnesses’ memories dim over time, so acting sooner is always better. You should consult with an attorney as soon as possible after the injury to protect your rights and preserve critical evidence.

What if the daycare claims the toy met safety standards, so they are not responsible?

Meeting a federal safety standard does not automatically shield a daycare from liability. Federal standards set a floor, not a ceiling. A daycare can still be negligent if it fails to supervise children adequately, mixes age groups without separating hazardous materials, or allows broken toys to remain in use. Additionally, a toy that met standards when new may no longer be safe once it has broken apart. The daycare’s duty of care under Illinois law requires active, ongoing attention to the safety of every item accessible to children in its care.

This page is an advertisement of Briskman Briskman & Greenberg. The firm’s principal office is located at 35 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1330, Chicago, IL 60601. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases. The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.

More Resources About Injuries From Unsafe Conditions and Equipment

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS