Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Can I Still Sue If I Signed a Liability Waiver

You signed the waiver. You handed it back. And now you’re injured, sitting in a hospital room or a doctor’s office, wondering if that piece of paper you barely read just took away your right to sue. The short answer is: probably not. In Illinois, a signed liability waiver does not automatically end your case. Courts look hard at these documents, and they throw them out more often than most people realize. If you were hurt at a Chicago gym, a daycare near Wicker Park, a summer camp in the suburbs, or anywhere else that handed you a release form, you may still have a valid personal injury claim.

Table of Contents

What a Liability Waiver Actually Does in Illinois

A liability waiver, also called a release of liability or an exculpatory clause, is a contract. When you sign one, you agree not to hold a business or organization responsible if you get hurt while using their services or facilities. Waivers of liability are used frequently by businesses and property owners in an effort to avoid facing a lawsuit in the event somebody is injured on their property or while participating in their sponsored activities. You see them everywhere, from trampoline parks near the Loop to fitness centers in Lincoln Park, field trip permission slips, and daycare enrollment packets.

Here is the thing, though. In Illinois, even though liability agreements are considered legal contracts, they are not automatically enforceable. Courts can junk them. Illinois case law has made clear that these documents are not favored under the law. In legal terms, a liability waiver is known as an “exculpatory clause,” and people may be surprised to learn that these clauses are not favored by Illinois law. The law does not favor liability waivers for public safety policy reasons. As a result, courts closely scrutinize these types of agreements. That scrutiny is your opportunity. A waiver that looks airtight on paper may fall apart the moment a judge examines it closely. Do not assume that signing a form ended your legal rights before speaking with an attorney.

Illinois law also draws a firm line between ordinary assumed risk and actual negligence. The most essential criterion for determining whether a release is enforceable is the foreseeability of the injury. Certain activities come with inherent risks. Waivers can release companies from liability for expected risks. But they may not protect a company from unexpected injuries. That distinction matters enormously when building your case.

When Illinois Courts Will Not Enforce a Waiver

Illinois courts use a four-part test to decide whether an exculpatory clause holds up. There are four elements required for an exculpatory clause to be enforceable in Illinois courts. The elements are: the terms of the clause must be clear, explicit, and concise; the clause must encompass the activity, circumstance, or situation contemplated by the parties; the clause must not be against settled public policy; and nothing in the relationship between the parties militates against upholding the agreement. If any one of those elements fails, the waiver can be thrown out entirely.

Language problems sink a lot of waivers. Some waivers of liability are too short and do not outline specific or detailed risks that are covered. Conversely, some waivers of liability are too long and full of legal jargon that may not necessarily be comprehensible to an ordinary consumer. In these cases, the waiver will likely be unenforceable under Illinois law. Think about that the next time someone hands you a five-page document and tells you to sign at the bottom before your kid’s activity starts.

Public policy is another major reason courts reject waivers. Although Illinois does permit parties to be able to contract away liability for their own negligence, the contract or waiver cannot violate public policy. To be against public policy, a waiver must include: (1) fraud; (2) willful and wanton negligence; (3) substantial disparity in the bargaining power; or (4) the presence of some other factor in the social relationship of the parties which militates against upholding the agreement. Gross negligence, fraud, and willful misconduct are simply not things a business can contract its way out of. Under Illinois law, liability waivers can only protect individuals and businesses against ordinary negligence. Release forms will not shield individuals or organizations from intentionally wrongful acts, recklessness, or gross negligence.

Gross Negligence, Willful Conduct, and Why They Change Everything

There is a meaningful legal difference between someone making a mistake and someone acting with reckless disregard for your safety. That difference is what separates ordinary negligence from gross negligence or willful and wanton conduct, and it is one of the most powerful arguments for setting aside a liability waiver in Illinois.

Illinois law does not protect issuers of liability waivers against injuries or wrongful deaths caused by fraud, wanton acts, and willful misconduct. For instance, if a company negligently ignores repairs to equipment or safety devices, fails to properly maintain facilities, or fraudulently misrepresents the safety of machinery, the waiver may be ineffective. In these circumstances, the entity issuing the waiver has deceived the injured party into an agreement that unduly puts them at risk of harm. Consider a Chicago daycare that knew a piece of playground equipment was broken for weeks and let children use it anyway. A waiver signed by a parent at enrollment would not protect that facility from a lawsuit over injuries caused by that kind of deliberate inaction.

Waivers do not release defendants from liability for willful or wanton negligence, and they cannot release liability for violations of law or public policy. They also do not remove a party’s responsibility to exercise due care to maintain safe premises. For example, a waiver may protect a trampoline park from liability for common injuries, but the company is still responsible to maintain equipment to safety standards and may be liable if the injury was due to damaged or worn equipment. The same logic applies across every type of facility, from a gym near Michigan Avenue to a licensed daycare center on the Northwest Side. Signing a form does not give any business a free pass to be reckless with your safety or your child’s safety.

Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, Illinois follows a modified comparative negligence standard. A plaintiff can still recover damages as long as their own fault does not exceed 50% of the total cause of the injury. This means that even if you share some responsibility for what happened, you may still be entitled to compensation, and any damages awarded are reduced only in proportion to your share of fault.

Waivers Signed on Behalf of Children Are Generally Unenforceable

This is one of the most important facts for any Chicago parent to know. If you enrolled your child in a daycare, a summer camp, a before-and-after-school program, or any other supervised activity and signed a liability waiver on their behalf, that waiver almost certainly cannot be used against your child’s claim.

Illinois courts have held that waivers of liability signed by a parent before a minor child’s cause of action are ineffective. This rule is well-established in Illinois case law. In Meyer v. Naperville Manner, Inc., 262 Ill.App.3d 141 (2d Dist. 1994), the court confirmed that Illinois is not alone in applying this rule. It is the general rule that, in the absence of statutory or judicial authorization, a parent cannot waive, compromise, or release a minor child’s cause of action.

What this means practically is enormous. Parents enroll children in daycares across Chicago, from Pilsen to Rogers Park to Hyde Park, and sign intake packets full of forms without realizing that the liability release buried inside those packets has no legal effect on their child’s right to sue. This means that other individuals, businesses, or entities could be responsible for injuries that occur to a minor regardless of whether or not a waiver of liability was signed. If your child was hurt at a Chicago daycare due to inadequate supervision, unsafe premises, untrained staff, or any other form of negligence, a waiver you signed at enrollment does not bar a claim on your child’s behalf. An experienced Chicago abogado de lesiones personales can evaluate your child’s case and explain what legal options remain available to your family.

Unequal Bargaining Power and Other Grounds to Challenge a Waiver

Even when a waiver is clearly written and covers the right activity, it can still be challenged if the circumstances under which it was signed were fundamentally unfair. Illinois courts examine the balance of power between the parties, and they do not look kindly on situations where one party had no real choice but to sign.

There are recognized signs of an uneven bargaining position. One is if one party was “under economic or other compulsion” to sign the waiver. For example, a pre-injury release between an employer and employee is immediately invalid because the employee’s economic position would compel them to sign the paper. A similar problem arises when someone has no practical alternative. Another sign of an unfair bargaining position is if one party could not reasonably get their needed services from another provider. This is the reason why public utilities and common carriers (buses, trains, and so on) cannot legitimately hold their customers under a waiver. Customers usually have no reasonable alternative for their electric provider or bus transportation. They are at an unfair bargaining position should these providers hand out a liability release. This makes the release invalid.

Coercion and deception also matter. In Illinois, participants must sign the waiver of their own free will, with a complete understanding of its contents and implications. If there is any evidence of coercion, pressure, or deceit involved in obtaining a participant’s signature, it could render the waiver invalid. If a business buried a waiver inside a stack of enrollment forms and never drew your attention to it, or if the waiver was presented in a way that obscured what you were actually agreeing to, those facts may support a challenge. Courts also look at whether the injury that occurred was actually within the scope of what the waiver covered. If the injury you suffered resulted from negligence that goes beyond the scope of the waiver, you may have a valid claim. For instance, if you signed a waiver to participate in a fitness class but were then injured due to faulty equipment maintenance, that negligence may not be covered by the waiver. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, when multiple defendants share responsibility for your injuries, Illinois joint and several liability rules determine how damages are allocated. That framework applies regardless of whether a waiver exists, particularly for medical expenses. Talking to an attorney is the only way to know for certain whether the waiver you signed holds up, and Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is ready to take that look with you. Call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation.

FAQs About Liability Waivers in Chicago, IL

Does signing a liability waiver mean I can never sue in Illinois?

No. Signing a waiver does not automatically prevent you from filing a lawsuit in Illinois. Courts examine waivers carefully and reject them when they fail to meet legal standards, violate public policy, involve gross negligence or willful misconduct, or were signed under unfair circumstances. Many waivers that appear binding turn out to be unenforceable once an attorney reviews them.

Can a Chicago daycare use a liability waiver to avoid responsibility for my child’s injury?

Generally, no. Illinois courts have consistently held that a parent cannot sign away a minor child’s legal rights through a pre-injury liability waiver. Even if you signed an enrollment form containing a release of liability, that document typically cannot be used to block your child’s personal injury claim. Your child’s right to seek compensation remains intact regardless of what you signed at enrollment.

What makes a liability waiver unenforceable in Illinois?

Illinois courts will not enforce a waiver that uses vague or confusing language, covers conduct beyond what was reasonably contemplated, violates public policy, involves fraud or willful and wanton misconduct, or was signed under conditions of unequal bargaining power. A waiver that is too broad, too long, or buried in fine print may also fail to hold up in court.

Does Illinois modified comparative negligence affect my claim if I signed a waiver?

Yes, and it can work in your favor. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, Illinois follows a modified comparative negligence rule. If a court finds that the waiver does not bar your claim, you can still recover damages as long as your own fault is 50% or less of the total cause of your injury. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault, but you are not barred from recovery entirely unless your share exceeds 50%.

How long do I have to file a personal injury lawsuit in Illinois after signing a waiver?

The statute of limitations for most personal injury claims in Illinois is two years from the date of the injury. For claims involving minor children, the clock generally does not begin to run until the child turns 18, which gives families more time to act. However, evidence can disappear quickly, so contacting Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 as soon as possible after an injury gives your case the strongest foundation.

This page is an advertisement for legal services. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg is responsible for this content. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Viewing this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice specific to your situation. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, 351 W. Hubbard St., Suite 810, Chicago, IL 60654. Phone: (312) 222-0010.

More Resources About Frequently Asked Questions and Resources About Daycare Injuries

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS