Obtenga una consulta gratuita con un abogado de lesiones personales

Valoración de T.V.

"Recomiendo encarecidamente BB&G ... Le daría 10 estrellas si pudiera".

T

Valoración de G.V.

"¡Estoy muy contenta con la representación de BB&G!".

G

Valoración de M.S.

"Los abogados de BBG fueron excepcionales. El resultado fue mejor de lo que esperábamos".

M

Valoración de R.G.

"Desde el momento en que contacté con este bufete me trataron como de la familia".

R

Valoración de A.H.

"No podríamos estar más contentos con el resultado ni con el excelente servicio".

A

Valoración de V.A.

"Nos sentimos muy seguros y confiados con su representación".

V

Valoración de J.P.

"Briskman Briskman & Greenberg es una fuerza legal a tener en cuenta".

J

Valoración de T.Z.

"Estoy contento con cómo han llevado mi caso y recomiendo llamarles".

T

Valoración de K.N.

"Proceso muy fácil con la ayuda de estas increíbles personas. Resultado muy feliz".

K

Failure to Diagnose MRSA Medical Malpractice in Chicago

MRSA, or Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is one of the most dangerous bacterial infections a patient can face. It is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections and is commonly associated with significant morbidity, mortality, increased length of stay, and a high cost burden. When a doctor, nurse, or hospital fails to identify MRSA in time, the results can be catastrophic. Patients who visit emergency rooms, undergo surgery, or stay in Chicago-area hospitals deserve a proper diagnosis. When that does not happen, and someone is seriously hurt or dies, Illinois law may give that person or their family the right to pursue a medical malpractice claim. If this happened to you or someone you love, a Chicago abogado de lesiones personales at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can review your case and explain your options. Our office is located at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606.

Table of Contents

What Makes MRSA So Dangerous When a Doctor Misses It

MRSA is a type of staph that can be resistant to several antibiotics. That resistance is what makes it so deadly when left untreated. Standard antibiotics that work on ordinary staph infections will not stop MRSA. So a doctor who treats a patient for a routine skin infection without testing for MRSA may be giving that patient medicine that does absolutely nothing.

MRSA infections can cause serious problems in and outside of healthcare settings, including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, surgical site infections, sepsis (the body’s extreme response to an infection if left untreated), and death if left untreated. Each of these outcomes represents a real risk that grows every hour a diagnosis is delayed.

Nearly 120,000 Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections and 20,000 associated deaths occurred in the United States in 2017. Those numbers reflect how widespread and deadly this infection remains. Hospitals across Chicago, from those along the lakefront to facilities serving neighborhoods like Pilsen, Humboldt Park, and Englewood, see MRSA cases regularly. The bacteria does not discriminate by ZIP code.

You cannot tell by looking at the skin if it is a MRSA infection. People sometimes confuse some MRSA skin infections with a spider bite. That confusion is a real clinical problem. Doctors who dismiss a wound as a minor bite without ordering a culture test may be falling below the standard of care. When that mistake causes harm, it can form the basis of a malpractice claim.

While MRSA commonly causes skin infections, some of which can be severe, it becomes significantly more life-threatening when it invades the bloodstream, especially in older patients and those with chronic conditions. Patients in nursing homes, post-surgical recovery units, and intensive care settings face the highest risk. A missed diagnosis in any of those settings can turn a treatable condition into a life-ending one.

How a Failure to Diagnose MRSA Becomes Medical Malpractice in Illinois

Not every missed diagnosis is malpractice. The legal question is whether the doctor or healthcare provider failed to meet the accepted standard of care. The standard of care is the level of skill and treatment that a reasonably competent medical professional in the same specialty would provide under similar circumstances. If a doctor’s failure to test for or identify MRSA falls below that standard, and that failure caused harm, you may have a valid malpractice claim.

To prove a failure to diagnose MRSA case in Illinois, your legal team must generally establish four things. First, a doctor-patient relationship existed. Second, the provider failed to meet the standard of care. Third, that failure directly caused your injury. Fourth, you suffered real, measurable damages as a result. These four elements, duty, breach, causation, and damages, form the core of any negligence-based claim under Illinois law.

Common examples of actionable failures include not ordering a wound culture when MRSA risk factors were present, dismissing symptoms as minor without proper testing, discharging a patient too early before infection was ruled out, or failing to isolate a patient suspected of carrying MRSA in a hospital setting. Each of these situations can create a chain of harm that ends in serious injury or death.

Illinois courts have consistently held that healthcare providers must act on warning signs. A patient who presents to a Chicago emergency room near Millennium Park with a warm, swollen wound and a fever is showing classic MRSA warning signs. Healthcare providers should be contacted, especially if the symptoms include a fever or do not improve within 48 hours. A provider who ignores those signs and sends the patient home may have breached the duty of care.

Connecting with an experienced abogado de negligencias médicas early in the process gives you the best chance of building a strong case while evidence is still fresh and medical records are accessible.

Illinois Law Requirements for Filing a Failure to Diagnose MRSA Claim

Illinois has specific procedural rules that apply to every medical malpractice case, including MRSA failure-to-diagnose claims. Understanding these rules before you file is critical. Missing a step or a deadline can end your case before it starts.

Under the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, specifically 735 ILCS 5/2-622, every plaintiff filing a medical malpractice lawsuit must attach an affidavit to the complaint. That affidavit must state that the plaintiff’s attorney has consulted with a qualified healthcare professional who has reviewed the medical records and determined there is a reasonable and meritorious basis for the claim. This requirement applies whether the case is filed in Cook County Circuit Court, the Daley Center in the Loop, or any other Illinois court.

The reviewing health professional must be knowledgeable in the relevant area of medicine, must have practiced or taught in that area within the last six years, and must provide a written report supporting the claim. For claims against a physician licensed to practice medicine in all its branches, the report must come from a similarly licensed physician. This is not a technicality. Failure to file the affidavit and report can result in dismissal of the entire case.

The statute of limitations under 735 ILCS 5/13-212 gives most adult patients two years from the date they knew, or reasonably should have known, that an injury was caused by medical negligence. There is also a four-year statute of repose, meaning no claim can be filed more than four years after the negligent act, regardless of when it was discovered. For minors, the rules differ. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212(b), a minor generally has up to eight years from the act or omission, but no claim may be brought after the minor’s 22nd birthday.

If a loved one died from an undiagnosed MRSA infection, a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180, may apply. That statute allows surviving family members to seek compensation for their loss. Punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice cases under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115, but compensatory damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of income remain available.

What Damages Can You Recover in a Chicago MRSA Malpractice Case

Illinois law allows patients harmed by a failure to diagnose MRSA to seek both economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages are the measurable financial losses, things like hospital bills, follow-up surgeries, rehabilitation costs, prescription medications, and lost wages. Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and the lasting physical consequences of a severe infection.

MRSA complications can be severe and long-lasting. A patient whose bloodstream infection was missed may require weeks of intravenous antibiotic therapy, multiple surgeries to remove infected tissue, or even amputation of a limb. The costs of that level of care add up fast, and they are recoverable as part of a malpractice claim.

Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117, when multiple defendants are found liable, the rules for joint and several liability depend on the percentage of fault. Any defendant whose fault is found to be 25% or greater is jointly and severally liable for all damages. Any defendant whose fault is less than 25% is only severally liable for damages other than past and future medical expenses. This matters when a claim involves both a treating physician and a hospital, which is common in MRSA cases.

Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, attorney contingency fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are capped. The total fee cannot exceed 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered. This cap means that your attorney’s compensation comes from the recovery, not from your pocket upfront. You pay nothing unless your case results in a recovery.

If you want to understand how damages work in your specific situation, speaking with a abogado de negligencia médica who handles these cases is the right first step. Every case is different, and past results in other cases do not guarantee any particular outcome in yours.

Who Can Be Held Liable for a Failure to Diagnose MRSA in Chicago

More than one party can bear responsibility for a missed MRSA diagnosis. Illinois law allows patients to name multiple defendants in a single lawsuit, and identifying all potentially liable parties is a key part of building a strong case.

Attending physicians are the most obvious potential defendants. If a doctor examined a patient, observed risk factors for MRSA, and chose not to order a culture or appropriate testing, that decision may constitute a breach of the standard of care. Emergency room doctors, hospitalists, surgeons, and primary care physicians can all be named depending on the facts.

Hospitals and healthcare systems can also be held liable. When a hospital’s policies, staffing decisions, or failure to implement infection control protocols contribute to a missed MRSA diagnosis, the institution itself may be responsible. Chicago hospitals near the Medical District on the Near West Side, as well as community hospitals throughout Cook County, are subject to the same standards as any other healthcare facility in Illinois.

Nurses and other clinical staff also play a role. A nurse who observes signs of worsening infection and fails to escalate that information to a physician may have breached the nursing standard of care. Failure to communicate critical patient changes is a recognized form of clinical negligence under Illinois law.

Laboratory personnel can be a factor too. If a lab mishandled a specimen, delayed results, or failed to flag a positive MRSA culture for immediate attention, that error may have contributed to the patient’s harm. A skilled abogado de negligencias médicas will review every link in the chain of care to identify all parties whose negligence contributed to the outcome.

In some cases, a hospital-acquired MRSA infection that goes undiagnosed implicates both the provider who missed it and the facility that allowed the bacteria to spread. Identifying all responsible parties ensures that the full scope of accountability is addressed in your claim. Working with a abogado de negligencia médica who understands how to investigate these multi-party cases can make a real difference in the outcome.

FAQs About Failure to Diagnose MRSA Medical Malpractice in Chicago

How do I know if my doctor’s failure to diagnose MRSA qualifies as malpractice?

The key question is whether your doctor’s actions fell below the accepted standard of care. If a reasonably competent physician in the same specialty, facing the same clinical situation, would have ordered a culture test or taken other steps to identify MRSA, and your doctor did not, that gap may constitute malpractice. You also need to show that the failure directly caused your harm. A qualified medical expert must review your records and confirm there is a reasonable basis for the claim before a lawsuit can be filed in Illinois under 735 ILCS 5/2-622. The team at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg can help you get that process started. Call us at (312) 222-0010 for a free consultation.

What is the deadline to file a failure to diagnose MRSA lawsuit in Illinois?

Under 735 ILCS 5/13-212, most adult patients have two years from the date they knew or reasonably should have known that their injury was caused by medical negligence. There is also a four-year statute of repose that runs from the date of the negligent act itself. That means even if you discover the problem late, the absolute outer limit is four years from when the malpractice occurred. Do not wait. Contact Briskman Briskman & Greenberg at (312) 222-0010 as soon as possible to protect your rights.

Can I sue a hospital, not just a doctor, for missing my MRSA diagnosis?

Yes. Hospitals in Illinois can be held liable for their own negligence, including failures in infection control protocols, inadequate staffing, or systemic failures that contributed to a missed MRSA diagnosis. If a hospital’s policies or practices played a role in your harm, the institution can be named as a defendant alongside the treating physician. Illinois law under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 addresses how fault is allocated among multiple defendants, including hospitals and individual providers.

What if my family member died from an undiagnosed MRSA infection?

If a loved one died because a healthcare provider failed to diagnose MRSA in time, your family may have a wrongful death claim under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 740 ILCS 180. This law allows the personal representative of the deceased’s estate to bring a claim on behalf of surviving family members. Recoverable damages can include loss of financial support, loss of companionship, and the grief and suffering of survivors. Punitive damages are not available in healing art malpractice cases under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115. The deadline for wrongful death claims is generally two years from the date of death.

Does it cost anything to speak with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg about my MRSA malpractice case?

No. Briskman Briskman & Greenberg offers free consultations for medical malpractice cases. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1114, attorney contingency fees in Illinois medical malpractice cases are capped at 33 and one-third percent of all sums recovered, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless your case results in a recovery. You may still be responsible for case costs and expenses depending on the terms of your fee agreement, so be sure to discuss that when you call. Reach us at (312) 222-0010 or visit our office at 205 W Randolph St., Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60606.

More Resources About Infectious Disease Negligence in Chicago

La experiencia general que tuve con Briskman Briskman & Greenberg fue del tipo que todo el mundo debería recibir de cualquier empresa.

El personal se mantuvo en contacto conmigo por teléfono y correo electrónico, estaban muy bien informados, se aseguraron de que entendiera lo que estaba pasando en todo momento, respondieron a todas mis preguntas, fueron transparentes, y definitivamente superaron mis expectativas. Los recomiendo encarecidamente.

- Brandon Spivey

El nivel de cuidado, atención, empatía y preocupación en relación con mi caso al tratar con Briskman Briskman y Greenberg superó mis expectativas.


Eran extremadamente informados y justos en todos los asuntos relacionados. Dieron ejemplo de excelente servicio y atención al cliente. Me mantuvieron informado y actualizado en todo momento y respondieron a todas mis preguntas. Recomiendo encarecidamente usarlos como lo haría de nuevo.


- Joshua Payton

Me sentí a gusto con la profesionalidad de Briskman y Briskman.


Paul Greenberg especialmente poner mi mente para descansar y en un plazo de un año he resuelto mi caso y estoy muy satisfecho con el resultado. Mi lesión fue devastador, pero trabajar con este bufete de abogados ha puesto un montón de noches estresantes para descansar.


- Nakia Childs

Necesitaba un abogado de lesiones personales y Gavin y su equipo fueron más allá.


Hicieron que el proceso fuera sencillo y me ayudaron en cada paso del camino. Lo que realmente aprecio es que son directos y responden rápidamente a mis preguntas y a cualquier problema con un mensaje de texto o una llamada telefónica. Además, me controlaron continuamente. ¡Estoy contento con la forma en que manejaron mi caso y recomendaría darles una llamada!


- Ted Zakrzewski

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers (BBG) is a legal team you want on your side.


Llevaron mi caso de manera profesional, sensible y muy competente. El personal muestra experiencia en el ámbito jurídico y proporcionó un excelente apoyo y atención al cliente. Gracias BBG por su ayuda con la navegación de un caso muy sensible y difícil para mi familia.


- Robin Albritton

Si ha sufrido un accidente y necesita un abogado excelente, ¡¡¡hable con Paul!!!

Muy agradable y profesional abogado que extremadamente se preocupa por sus clientes. Crucemos los dedos para que nunca vuelva a tener un accidente, pero si es así, ¡sin duda, 10/10 volvería a utilizar Paul!

- Danny S.

Estoy muy satisfecha con la representación de BB&G.

Robert Briskman manejó mi caso de lesiones muy bien. Personalidad divertida y comprensiva y se tomó el tiempo para explicar todo en detalle de todo el caso. Fue maravilloso trabajar con él. Yo recomendaría BB&G a cualquiera y para mí de nuevo en el futuro.

- Ginebra Vanderbilt

Desde el momento en que me puse en contacto con este bufete me trataron como de la familia. 

Gavin Pearlman fue honesto y sincero conmigo durante todo el proceso. Sin sorpresas y nunca me mantuvo colgado. Recomiendo encarecidamente estos abogados para sus necesidades.

- Ron Gaber

I cannot say enough good things about the attorneys at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers.


Fueron extremadamente receptivos, profesionales y compasivos durante todo el proceso. Sus habilidades de negociación fueron excepcionales, y fueron capaces de asegurar un acuerdo que superó con creces mis expectativas. Estoy agradecido de haber tenido un equipo tan dedicado".


- CD

Chicago lawyer, Paul A. Greenberg is a top-rated by Super Lawyers
Personal Injury Super Lawyers Rising Star
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Illinois State Bar Association
Top-rated lawyers at Briskman Briskman & Greenberg Personal Injury & Car Accident Lawyers are members of the Workers' Compensation Lawyers Association

VISTO EN:

USA TODAY
Associated Press
Chicago Sun Times
ABC NEWS
Chicago WGN9
NBC NEWS
FOX32 Chicago
CBS NEWS